analiza aiqbench
This paper addresses the finite-sample bias inherent in the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), a standard metric for evaluating generative models. The authors derive tight theoretical bounds on estimation error and introduce Relative Taylor Debiasing (RTD), an algorithm that achieves optimal sample complexity while reducing computational overhead compared to existing extrapolation methods. These contributions provide a more statistically rigorous foundation for benchmarking diffusion models and other generative architectures where FID is commonly applied.
Sample-Optimal Estimation of the Fr\'echet Inception Distance
arXiv:2610.07114v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID) is widely used to evaluate generative models, but its empirical plug-in estimator suffers from finite-sample bias [BSAG18, CF20]. We study the sample complexity $n$ of estimating FID to error $\epsilon$ between $d$-dimensional Gaussians with bounded mean distance and covariances, when one distribution is known. Our contributions are threefold. (1) We establish tight finite-sample $\Theta(\frac{d^2}{n})$ bias and $\Theta(\frac{d}{n} + \frac {d^2} {n^2})$ variance bounds for the empirical plug-in estimator, establishing a $\gtrsim d^2$ sample complexity. (2) To debias the empirical plug-in estimator, we generalize the ${\rm FID}_\infty$ estimator of [CF20] to extrapolation methods of arbitrary order $k$. We further prove tight bias and variance bounds of $\Theta(\frac{d^{k + 2}}{n^{k + 1}})$ and $\Theta(\frac d n + \frac{d^2}{n^2})$ for any order-$k$ extrapolation under our framework. (3) We introduce Relative Taylor Debiasing (RTD), a new, computationally efficient FID estimation algorithm using debiasing techniques inspired by U-statistics. We show that RTD achieves an $O(\frac d {\epsilon^2})$ sample complexity, and prove that this is optimal. We provide a complementary empirical evaluation of our new estimators. Our experiments on synthetic Gaussians validate the predicted residual bias and support the tightness of our bounds. On ImageNet with Inception embeddings, RTD achieves the lowest mean estimation error at the standard 50K sample budget, while our second-order variance-aware extrapolation estimator (VALE$_2$) uses only 10K samples to achieve accuracy comparable to FID$_\infty$ at 50K samples.
Abstract:The Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) is widely used to evaluate generative models, but its empirical plug-in estimator suffers from finite-sample bias [BSAG18, CF20]. We study the sample complexity $n$ of estimating FID to error $\epsilon$ between $d$-dimensional Gaussians with bounded mean distance and covariances, when one distribution is known. Our contributions are threefold. (1) We establish tight finite-sample $\Theta(\frac{d^2}{n})$ bias and $\Theta(\frac{d}{n} + \frac {d^2} {n^2})$ variance bounds for the empirical plug-in estimator, establishing a $\gtrsim d^2$ sample complexity. (2) To debias the empirical plug-in estimator, we generalize the ${\rm FID}_\infty$ estimator of [CF20] to extrapolation methods of arbitrary order $k$. We further prove tight bias and variance bounds of $\Theta(\frac{d^{k + 2}}{n^{k + 1}})$ and $\Theta(\frac d n + \frac{d^2}{n^2})$ for any order-$k$ extrapolation under our framework. (3) We introduce Relative Taylor Debiasing (RTD), a new, computationally efficient FID estimation algorithm using debiasing techniques inspired by U-statistics. We show that RTD achieves an $O(\frac d {\epsilon^2})$ sample complexity, and prove that this is optimal. We provide a complementary empirical evaluation of our new estimators. Our experiments on synthetic Gaussians validate the predicted residual bias and support the tightness of our bounds. On ImageNet with Inception embeddings, RTD achieves the lowest mean estimation error at the standard 50K sample budget, while our second-order variance-aware extrapolation estimator (VALE$_2$) uses only 10K samples to achieve accuracy comparable to FID$_\infty$ at 50K samples.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Statistics Theory (math.ST); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2610.07114 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.07114v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07114 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 265 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
One-Step Generative Modeling via Unbalanced Optimal Transport
arXiv · 30 sept. 2026
What FID Hides: Detecting, Ranking, and Diagnosing Deviations in Generative Evaluation
arXiv · 26 aug. 2026
Friction-Augmented Drifting Models for Resource-Efficient Domain Translation
arXiv · 17 aug. 2026
DMAD: Distribution Matching as Adversarial Distillation for Fast Visual Generation
arXiv · 2 oct. 2026