analiza aiqbench
SafeStage introduces a critical benchmark for evaluating the safety lifecycle of vision-language-conditioned robot policies, addressing the gap where task success often masks underlying physical hazards. By categorizing risks into pre-execution, during execution, and post-completion stages, this research provides essential diagnostic tools for improving the reliability of autonomous manipulation systems without conflating performance metrics with safety outcomes.
SafeStage: Evaluating Safety Before, During, and After Vision-Language-Conditioned Robot Manipulation
arXiv:2609.21223v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language-conditioned robot policies integrate perception, language understanding, and control for general-purpose manipulation. However, existing evaluations often focus on task success, isolated physical constraints, semantic refusal, or realized physical damage, providing limited insight into where safety fails during closed-loop manipulation. We introduce SafeStage, a lifecycle-structured benchmark for evaluating manipulation safety before, during, and after task execution. SafeStage contains 97 purpose-built risk scenarios organized into three stages. Initial-State Hazards captures safety-relevant relations that must be resolved before manipulating the target. Execution-Time Safety evaluates unsafe contacts, trajectories, region entries, and object interactions during execution. Final-State Hazards capture unstable or otherwise unsafe conditions remaining after nominal task completion. The benchmark evaluates realized interactions using event-based and state-based checks and reports native task success independently from stage-specific safety outcomes. We evaluate representative direct-action Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies and policies with world-model-based policies under a common closed-loop protocol. Our results demonstrate that nominal task completion frequently coexists with safety violations and that different policies exhibit distinct failure profiles across the three stages. By separating task success from safety and localizing when violations occur, SafeStage provides a unified diagnostic testbed for evaluating and improving vision-language-conditioned robot manipulation policies.
Abstract:Vision-language-conditioned robot policies integrate perception, language understanding, and control for general-purpose manipulation. However, existing evaluations often focus on task success, isolated physical constraints, semantic refusal, or realized physical damage, providing limited insight into where safety fails during closed-loop manipulation. We introduce SafeStage, a lifecycle-structured benchmark for evaluating manipulation safety before, during, and after task execution. SafeStage contains 97 purpose-built risk scenarios organized into three stages. Initial-State Hazards captures safety-relevant relations that must be resolved before manipulating the target. Execution-Time Safety evaluates unsafe contacts, trajectories, region entries, and object interactions during execution. Final-State Hazards capture unstable or otherwise unsafe conditions remaining after nominal task completion. The benchmark evaluates realized interactions using event-based and state-based checks and reports native task success independently from stage-specific safety outcomes. We evaluate representative direct-action Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies and policies with world-model-based policies under a common closed-loop protocol. Our results demonstrate that nominal task completion frequently coexists with safety violations and that different policies exhibit distinct failure profiles across the three stages. By separating task success from safety and localizing when violations occur, SafeStage provides a unified diagnostic testbed for evaluating and improving vision-language-conditioned robot manipulation policies.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.21223 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.21223v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21223 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 283 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

2026 BAIR Graduate Showcase
BAIR Blog · 1 iul. 2026
HazardArena: Evaluating Semantic Safety in Vision-Language-Action Models
arXiv · 23 sept. 2026
Vision-Language-Action Safety: Threats, Challenges, Evaluations, and Mechanisms
arXiv · 26 aug. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026