Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This arXiv paper introduces a benchmark for testing whether LLM agents can find and apply domain rules when the relevant information is spread across multiple files, a harder setup than most existing rule-reasoning tests. The headline result is that even frontier models reach only about 60% on identification and deduction and 27% to 55% end-to-end, which suggests agentic rule use in complex workspaces is far from solved. Readers evaluating agents for compliance or other specialized workflows should treat these as preliminary, benchmark-specific numbers, and check how the rule graphs and sub-scenarios were built before drawing broad conclusions.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, LessWrong, terrytao.wordpress.com, AWS
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

RuleTrek: Benchmarking Agentic Rule Reasoning in Complex Scenarios

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.19698v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly tackle complex real-world tasks in specialized domains. However, identifying and correctly applying domain-specific rules remains challenging when scenario information is distributed across multiple files. Existing rule-reasoning benchmarks typically represent scenarios using only a few factual statements, simplifying the identification and application of relevant rules. To address this gap, this paper introduces \textbf{RuleTrek}, a multi-domain benchmark for agentic rule reasoning in complex scenarios. Its rule-grounded construction pipeline extracts structured rule graphs, generates and incrementally composes rule-specific sub-scenarios while ensuring consistency and solvability. To systematically evaluate agentic rule reasoning in complex scenarios, RuleTrek assesses three capabilities in interactive workspaces: Rule Identification (RI), Rule Deduction (RD), and End-to-End Rule Reasoning (E2E). Experiments on 11 frontier LLMs show that the highest RI and RD scores are only 62.47\% and 60.43\%, respectively, while E2E scores range from 26.97\% to 55.29\%. These results demonstrate that current LLM agents face substantial challenges in rule reasoning over complex scenarios. We make our code and dataset publicly available at \href{https://github.com/yuan247/RuleTrek}{RuleTrek}.

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) increasingly tackle complex real-world tasks in specialized domains. However, identifying and correctly applying domain-specific rules remains challenging when scenario information is distributed across multiple files. Existing rule-reasoning benchmarks typically represent scenarios using only a few factual statements, simplifying the identification and application of relevant rules. To address this gap, this paper introduces \textbf{RuleTrek}, a multi-domain benchmark for agentic rule reasoning in complex scenarios. Its rule-grounded construction pipeline extracts structured rule graphs, generates and incrementally composes rule-specific sub-scenarios while ensuring consistency and solvability. To systematically evaluate agentic rule reasoning in complex scenarios, RuleTrek assesses three capabilities in interactive workspaces: Rule Identification (RI), Rule Deduction (RD), and End-to-End Rule Reasoning (E2E). Experiments on 11 frontier LLMs show that the highest RI and RD scores are only 62.47\% and 60.43\%, respectively, while E2E scores range from 26.97\% to 55.29\%. These results demonstrate that current LLM agents face substantial challenges in rule reasoning over complex scenarios. We make our code and dataset publicly available at \href{this https URL}{RuleTrek}.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.19698 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.19698v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19698 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 262 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe