analiza aiqbench
This research addresses a critical gap in safe AI control systems by proposing an iterative framework that maintains stability guarantees despite distribution shifts between training data and deployed policies. By integrating adversarially robust conformal prediction with sensitivity analysis, the method ensures safety across episodes without sacrificing performance on learned dynamics models. These findings represent significant progress toward reliable autonomous agents operating under uncertainty.
Robust Conformal CBF and CLF Controllers via Iterative Policy Updates
arXiv:2606.15366v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conformal prediction (CP) has been used to obtain probabilistic bounds on the error between a learned dynamics model and the true but unknown system. Such CP bounds can then be embedded into robust control Lyapunov function (CLF) and control barrier function (CBF) frameworks. However, such an approach does not retain stability/safety guarantees because of the distribution shift between the closed-loop trajectory distribution under the deployed CLF/CBF policy and the trajectory distribution from which the CP bound and its guarantees were derived. To address this issue, we propose an episodic framework that iteratively updates the robust conformal CLF/CBF policy while maintaining stability/safety guarantees across episodes. We achieve this by (1) using adversarially robust conformal prediction, and (2) quantifying a distribution shift budget that allows us to control how much the model error can increase across policy updates. This distribution shift budget is derived via a closed-loop trajectory sensitivity analysis, yielding an implicit and an explicit update rule for the CP bound. We analyze convergence of our algorithm, which we demonstrate on three case studies. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results that provide stability/safety guarantees for robust conformal CBF/CLF policies.
Abstract:Conformal prediction (CP) has been used to obtain probabilistic bounds on the error between a learned dynamics model and the true but unknown system. Such CP bounds can then be embedded into robust control Lyapunov function (CLF) and control barrier function (CBF) frameworks. However, such an approach does not retain stability/safety guarantees because of the distribution shift between the closed-loop trajectory distribution under the deployed CLF/CBF policy and the trajectory distribution from which the CP bound and its guarantees were derived. To address this issue, we propose an episodic framework that iteratively updates the robust conformal CLF/CBF policy while maintaining stability/safety guarantees across episodes. We achieve this by (1) using adversarially robust conformal prediction, and (2) quantifying a distribution shift budget that allows us to control how much the model error can increase across policy updates. This distribution shift budget is derived via a closed-loop trajectory sensitivity analysis, yielding an implicit and an explicit update rule for the CP bound. We analyze convergence of our algorithm, which we demonstrate on three case studies. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results that provide stability/safety guarantees for robust conformal CBF/CLF policies.
Systems and Control (eess.SY); Robotics (cs.RO); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2606.15366 [eess.SY]
(or arXiv:2606.15366v1 [eess.SY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.15366 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 294 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026

Implementing and Evaluating a Basic Per-Action Monitor for Safer Evals
METR · 27 sept. 2026

Reflection’s Beam model hits 501 billion parameters
Quantum Zeitgeist · 5 oct. 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026