analiza aiqbench
This arXiv preprint proposes a method for steering diffusion models at inference time while controlling tail risk, using Conditional Value-at-Risk with KL regularization. It reduces the problem to a one-dimensional search over the CVaR threshold, notes that this search can be nonconvex, and offers finite-sample guarantees. The experiments are limited to synthetic data and Stable Diffusion image generation, so readers should treat the tail-performance gains as preliminary until they are replicated on broader benchmarks.
Risk-Averse Inference-Time Diffusion Model Alignment with Finite-Sample Guarantees
arXiv:2610.17579v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inference-time alignment steers diffusion models toward downstream objectives without costly fine-tuning, but existing methods typically optimize expected cost (or reward) without explicitly controlling tail risk. In this work, we propose a risk-averse framework for inference-time alignment of diffusion models that balances expected cost and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) under trajectory-level Kullback-Leibler regularization. We characterize the optimal path distribution and reverse transitions as functions of the CVaR threshold, reducing the alignment problem to a one-dimensional optimization problem over the threshold. We show that this one-dimensional optimization problem can be nonconvex in general, establish sufficient conditions for convexity, and introduce quadratic regularization to enable efficient derivative-free ternary search. Under suitable assumptions, we provide finite-sample guarantees for threshold optimization and value estimation, and combine them into a terminal total-variation bound relative to the regularized target under exact resampling. Experiments on synthetic data and image generation using Stable Diffusion demonstrate improved tail performance over risk-neutral baselines while maintaining competitive average cost.
Abstract:Inference-time alignment steers diffusion models toward downstream objectives without costly fine-tuning, but existing methods typically optimize expected cost (or reward) without explicitly controlling tail risk. In this work, we propose a risk-averse framework for inference-time alignment of diffusion models that balances expected cost and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) under trajectory-level Kullback-Leibler regularization. We characterize the optimal path distribution and reverse transitions as functions of the CVaR threshold, reducing the alignment problem to a one-dimensional optimization problem over the threshold. We show that this one-dimensional optimization problem can be nonconvex in general, establish sufficient conditions for convexity, and introduce quadratic regularization to enable efficient derivative-free ternary search. Under suitable assumptions, we provide finite-sample guarantees for threshold optimization and value estimation, and combine them into a terminal total-variation bound relative to the regularized target under exact resampling. Experiments on synthetic data and image generation using Stable Diffusion demonstrate improved tail performance over risk-neutral baselines while maintaining competitive average cost.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2610.17579 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2610.17579v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17579 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 257 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

The world's best gradual disempowerment model organism: Frontier AI labs
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026
Against Export Controls (and China Threat Models)
LessWrong · 24 sept. 2026
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026