analiza aiqbench
RewardHarness introduces a novel, training-free framework that treats reward modeling as an iterative evolution of agent tools rather than traditional weight optimization. By leveraging a small fraction of preference data to automatically refine its reasoning library, it significantly outperforms standard models on image editing benchmarks while reducing reliance on large-scale human annotations. This approach represents a meaningful advance in agentic RLHF for generative AI applications.
RewardHarness: Self-Evolving Agentic Post-Training
arXiv:2605.08703v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Aligning generative models with human preferences remains a central challenge. While RLHF is widely adopted, it relies on large-scale preference data. This limitation is particularly evident in evaluating instruction-guided image edits, even though humans can often learn such preferences from only a few examples. We present RewardHarness, a training-free, self-evolving agentic reward framework that reframes reward modeling as context evolution rather than weight optimization. Instead of learning from large-scale annotations, RewardHarness aligns with human preferences by iteratively evolving a library of tools and skills from as few as 100 preference demonstrations. Given a source image, an edited image, and an editing instruction, an orchestrator agent selects the most relevant subset of tools and skills from the maintained library, and sub-agents invoke them to construct a reasoning chain that produces a reward score. By comparing predicted scores with ground-truth preferences and analyzing successes and failures in the reasoning process, the orchestrator automatically refines its library of tools and skills without additional human annotation. Using only 0.05% of the EditReward preference data, RewardHarness achieves 47.4% average accuracy on EditReward-Bench K=2/3/4 and GenAI-Bench, surpassing GPT-5 by 5.3 points. When used as a reward signal in FlowGRPO, RL-tuned models achieve 3.52 on ImgEdit-Bench. Code and model are available at the project page: https://rewardharness.com/
Authors:Yuxuan Zhang, Cong Wei, Penghui Du, Bo Li, Junwen Miao, Huaisong Zhang, Songcheng Cai, Yubo Wang, Dongfu Jiang, Yuyu Zhang, Changqian Yu, Ping Nie, Wenhu Chen, Kelsey R. Allen
Abstract:Aligning generative models with human preferences remains a central challenge. While RLHF is widely adopted, it relies on large-scale preference data. This limitation is particularly evident in evaluating instruction-guided image edits, even though humans can often learn such preferences from only a few examples. We present RewardHarness, a training-free, self-evolving agentic reward framework that reframes reward modeling as context evolution rather than weight optimization. Instead of learning from large-scale annotations, RewardHarness aligns with human preferences by iteratively evolving a library of tools and skills from as few as 100 preference demonstrations. Given a source image, an edited image, and an editing instruction, an orchestrator agent selects the most relevant subset of tools and skills from the maintained library, and sub-agents invoke them to construct a reasoning chain that produces a reward score. By comparing predicted scores with ground-truth preferences and analyzing successes and failures in the reasoning process, the orchestrator automatically refines its library of tools and skills without additional human annotation. Using only 0.05% of the EditReward preference data, RewardHarness achieves 47.4% average accuracy on EditReward-Bench K=2/3/4 and GenAI-Bench, surpassing GPT-5 by 5.3 points. When used as a reward signal in FlowGRPO, RL-tuned models achieve 3.52 on ImgEdit-Bench. Code and model are available at the project page: this https URL
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.08703 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.08703v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 264 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026