analiza aiqbench
This paper argues that the widely cited 16x training-compute penalty for diffusion language models (DLMs) versus autoregressive models came from an outdated evaluation method (ELBO scoring) and a full-sequence architecture. Using exact likelihood, block diffusion, and encoder-decoder designs, the authors report gaps of 3.0x to 12.8x across about 1,700 models, depending on block size. Readers should treat these as results from one large experimental sweep that still needs independent replication, but they do suggest DLM pretraining may be more practical than assumed.
Revisiting the 16x Pretraining Compute Gap between Diffusion and Autoregressive Language Models
arXiv:2610.17590v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion language models (DLMs) have attracted wide attention for their fast, parallel decoding, but they are believed to be far less efficient to train than autoregressive language models (ARMs): a widely cited study reports that a DLM needs roughly 16x the training compute of an ARM to match its likelihood, a figure that has made pretraining DLMs from scratch look prohibitive at scale. We find that the methodology behind this figure has fallen out of step with current DLM practice: it scores the model with its evidence lower bound (ELBO) and trains a full-sequence, decoder-only model. We therefore revisit the scaling laws of DLMs, adopting the exact likelihood under the model's own decoding order, block diffusion training, an encoder-decoder architecture, and a sweep over the block sizes used in practice. Under this new protocol, we study across ten model variants, about 1,700 models in total, and find that pretraining DLMs is far cheaper than previously thought. Concretely, scoring with the exact likelihood reduces the compute multiple to 12.8x; block diffusion training and an encoder-decoder architecture further reduce it to 7.8x at block size 32, and smaller block sizes narrow it to 4.6x at block size 8 and 3.0x at block size 4. We complement these scaling analyses with an empirical rule for the optimal decoder depth of encoder-decoder block diffusion, a held-out compute budget beyond the fitting range at which the gap between variants persists, and downstream benchmark results where likelihood improvements carry over to accuracy. Overall, the 16x figure substantially overstates the pretraining cost gap between DLMs and ARMs, and pretraining DLMs from scratch is far more viable than previously assumed.
Abstract:Diffusion language models (DLMs) have attracted wide attention for their fast, parallel decoding, but they are believed to be far less efficient to train than autoregressive language models (ARMs): a widely cited study reports that a DLM needs roughly 16x the training compute of an ARM to match its likelihood, a figure that has made pretraining DLMs from scratch look prohibitive at scale. We find that the methodology behind this figure has fallen out of step with current DLM practice: it scores the model with its evidence lower bound (ELBO) and trains a full-sequence, decoder-only model. We therefore revisit the scaling laws of DLMs, adopting the exact likelihood under the model's own decoding order, block diffusion training, an encoder-decoder architecture, and a sweep over the block sizes used in practice. Under this new protocol, we study across ten model variants, about 1,700 models in total, and find that pretraining DLMs is far cheaper than previously thought. Concretely, scoring with the exact likelihood reduces the compute multiple to 12.8x; block diffusion training and an encoder-decoder architecture further reduce it to 7.8x at block size 32, and smaller block sizes narrow it to 4.6x at block size 8 and 3.0x at block size 4. We complement these scaling analyses with an empirical rule for the optimal decoder depth of encoder-decoder block diffusion, a held-out compute budget beyond the fitting range at which the gap between variants persists, and downstream benchmark results where likelihood improvements carry over to accuracy. Overall, the 16x figure substantially overstates the pretraining cost gap between DLMs and ARMs, and pretraining DLMs from scratch is far more viable than previously assumed.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.17590 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.17590v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17590 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 369 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

STARFlow2: Bridging Language Models and Normalizing Flows for Unified Multimodal Generation
Apple · 25 aug. 2026
Data-Constrained Language Model Pretraining: Improved Regularization and Scaling Laws
arXiv · 10 iun. 2026
Data-Constrained Language Model Pretraining: Improved Regularization and Scaling Laws
arXiv · 8 iun. 2026
Mechanism Shift During Post-training from Autoregressive to Masked Diffusion Language Models
arXiv · 1 sept. 2026