analiza aiqbench
This study establishes response drift as a universal phenomenon across frontier large language models, revealing significant variations in deviation magnitude between different systems. The research underscores that automated similarity metrics fail to capture the complexity of human-judged quality, necessitating extensive human-centered evaluation to understand domain-specific structural differences in model outputs. These findings are critical for researchers aiming to benchmark and align next-generation AI systems with expert-validated standards.
Response drift across frontier large language models
arXiv:2607.20454v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: All frontier large language models (LLMs) exhibit response drift -- producing outputs that deviate from expert-validated references -- yet the magnitude and structure of this drift remain uncharacterised by systematic human evaluation. Here we report a fully crossed evaluation in which 47 geographically diverse participants each assessed all 62 multidomain questions across ten frontier LLMs under blinded conditions, yielding 29,140 independent assessments. Every model drifts, but drift magnitude varies substantially: eight models converge on a statistically indistinguishable ceiling (78-81% deviation), while two achieve lower deviation (47-49%). Drift profiles differ across six domains and 62 questions, with pairwise correlations among ceiling models exceeding r = 0.85. Automated similarity metrics explain less than 2% of variance in human judgements. These findings reveal that response drift is universal across frontier LLMs, domain- and question-dependent in structure, and accessible only through human-centred evaluation.
Abstract:All frontier large language models (LLMs) exhibit response drift -- producing outputs that deviate from expert-validated references -- yet the magnitude and structure of this drift remain uncharacterised by systematic human evaluation. Here we report a fully crossed evaluation in which 47 geographically diverse participants each assessed all 62 multidomain questions across ten frontier LLMs under blinded conditions, yielding 29,140 independent assessments. Every model drifts, but drift magnitude varies substantially: eight models converge on a statistically indistinguishable ceiling (78-81% deviation), while two achieve lower deviation (47-49%). Drift profiles differ across six domains and 62 questions, with pairwise correlations among ceiling models exceeding r = 0.85. Automated similarity metrics explain less than 2% of variance in human judgements. These findings reveal that response drift is universal across frontier LLMs, domain- and question-dependent in structure, and accessible only through human-centred evaluation.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.20454 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.20454v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.20454 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 237 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · 13 oct. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026

Improving CoT Monitorability of Evaluation Awareness via Verbalization Training
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026