analiza aiqbench
This reproduction study validates the existence of subliminal learning in open-weight models while demonstrating that its effects are not universal across different traits, tasks, or architectures. The findings highlight significant variability in how behavioral preferences transmit through semantically unrelated data, challenging the notion of a consistent distillation artifact.
Reproducing and Evaluating the Generalizability of Subliminal Learning in Open-Weight Models
arXiv:2609.12586v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this reproduction paper we investigate subliminal learning, a consequence of distillation where teacher models transmit behavioral preference traits through semantically unrelated data. The original paper explores two types of traits (animal preferences and misalignment), three data modalities (number sequences, code, and chain of thought), and several model families. We reproduce their experiments and extend the setup along three axes: new preference categories (actors and politicians), a new task (chess move generation), and an additional open-weight model (Ministral8B). We also run a controlled ablation on the numbers task's answer-space size (1-, 2-, and 3-digit sequences). We focus on open-weight models with accessible checkpoints on HuggingFace, since the original paper's GPT-4.x fine-tuning is no longer available. Our reproduction supports the original paper's claims, but our extensions show they are not universal as transmission strength varies across traits and tasks, and one model shows almost no effect at all.
Abstract:In this reproduction paper we investigate subliminal learning, a consequence of distillation where teacher models transmit behavioral preference traits through semantically unrelated data. The original paper explores two types of traits (animal preferences and misalignment), three data modalities (number sequences, code, and chain of thought), and several model families. We reproduce their experiments and extend the setup along three axes: new preference categories (actors and politicians), a new task (chess move generation), and an additional open-weight model (Ministral8B). We also run a controlled ablation on the numbers task's answer-space size (1-, 2-, and 3-digit sequences). We focus on open-weight models with accessible checkpoints on HuggingFace, since the original paper's GPT-4.x fine-tuning is no longer available. Our reproduction supports the original paper's claims, but our extensions show they are not universal as transmission strength varies across traits and tasks, and one model shows almost no effect at all.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.12586 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.12586v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12586 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 241 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Open Distillation of Hereditary Traits
AI Alignment Forum · 14 iul. 2026

Projection sampling preserves capabilities but diminishes gains from alignment fine-tuning
LessWrong · 16 oct. 2026
Models Can't Remember Their Training. Neither Can You.
LessWrong · 19 iul. 2026
How robust are natural language autoencoders to initialization?
AI Alignment Forum · 10 iul. 2026