analiza aiqbench
This research proposes a novel continual learning framework that eliminates the need for dedicated offline consolidation phases by leveraging biologically inspired rules like refractory rotation and hidden synapse isolation. The method successfully maintains performance on current inputs while writing past memories into unused degrees of freedom, achieving results comparable to or better than standard experience replay methods on benchmark datasets. By inverting the typical direction of non-interfering learning, this approach offers a more efficient paradigm for systems requiring continuous adaptation without stopping for retraining periods.
Replay in the Silent Degrees of Freedom: Continual Learning Without an Offline Phase
arXiv:2609.31630v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Replay-based continual learning almost always consolidates in a dedicated offline phase or by interleaving replayed samples with the input stream, whereas brains also consolidate during wakefulness through local sleep, brief use-dependent off-periods of individual circuits. We ask whether a network trained by local, biologically constrained rules can consolidate with no offline phase at all. An isolation rule confines replay updates to hidden synapses invisible to the current input under k-winner-take-all dynamics, with optimiser state advanced only inside the mask; a refractory rotation rule makes units that have just fired sit out the next competition, widening the consolidable set; a homeostatic pressure and a relative-novelty gate decide when replay bursts fire and when rotation runs. This inverts the usual direction of non-interfering continual learning: the hidden computation on the current input is held invariant (exactly on the proven channels, and for all but 0.3% of waking samples per update elsewhere) while past memories are written into the degrees of freedom the current batch leaves unused. On class-incremental split-MNIST the system reaches 91.6+-0.3% with no offline phase, at or above the best offline-night schedule on two held-out splits, tied with DER++ and above experience replay, ER-ACE, A-GEM and unmasked local replay; in a single pass it leads DER++ (91.8% against 90.1%) while the night falls to 76.9%. The advantage is largest at small buffers and gives way to the backpropagation references at large ones; on split CIFAR-10 the system leads offline rehearsal and experience replay but trails ER-ACE and DER++. Rotation carries most of the gain; isolation adds the invariance guarantee. The mechanism is not tied to the local rule: under the same schedule a backpropagation network with k-WTA hidden layers gains from rotation, and isolation is again free on top of it.
Abstract:Replay-based continual learning almost always consolidates in a dedicated offline phase or by interleaving replayed samples with the input stream, whereas brains also consolidate during wakefulness through local sleep, brief use-dependent off-periods of individual circuits. We ask whether a network trained by local, biologically constrained rules can consolidate with no offline phase at all. An isolation rule confines replay updates to hidden synapses invisible to the current input under k-winner-take-all dynamics, with optimiser state advanced only inside the mask; a refractory rotation rule makes units that have just fired sit out the next competition, widening the consolidable set; a homeostatic pressure and a relative-novelty gate decide when replay bursts fire and when rotation runs. This inverts the usual direction of non-interfering continual learning: the hidden computation on the current input is held invariant (exactly on the proven channels, and for all but 0.3% of waking samples per update elsewhere) while past memories are written into the degrees of freedom the current batch leaves unused. On class-incremental split-MNIST the system reaches 91.6+-0.3% with no offline phase, at or above the best offline-night schedule on two held-out splits, tied with DER++ and above experience replay, ER-ACE, A-GEM and unmasked local replay; in a single pass it leads DER++ (91.8% against 90.1%) while the night falls to 76.9%. The advantage is largest at small buffers and gives way to the backpropagation references at large ones; on split CIFAR-10 the system leads offline rehearsal and experience replay but trails ER-ACE and DER++. Rotation carries most of the gain; isolation adds the invariance guarantee. The mechanism is not tied to the local rule: under the same schedule a backpropagation network with k-WTA hidden layers gains from rotation, and isolation is again free on top of it.
25 pages, 10 figures. Code: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.31630 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.31630v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31630 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 399 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Building trust in AI agents: A production-ready evaluation framework with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · 16 oct. 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

I Did This Without Your Knowledge
LessWrong · 17 oct. 2026