analiza aiqbench
RepairFormer leverages transformer architectures to automatically correct corruptions in structured data files like JSON and INI, significantly improving content preservation over traditional deletion-based methods. By localizing repairs to specific fault regions, the system maintains semantic integrity while accelerating runtime compared to existing state-of-the-art techniques. This advancement addresses a critical bottleneck in software engineering pipelines where malformed inputs disrupt testing and automation workflows.
RepairFormer: Automated Repair of Structured Inputs Using Transformers
arXiv:2608.05060v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Structured input files such as JSON, DOT, OBJ, INI, S-expression, and TinyC are widely used in software systems, but small corruptions can cause parsers to reject otherwise useful data. Repairing such inputs is important because malformed configuration, program, and data files can interrupt testing, analysis, deployment, and downstream automation even when most of the original content remains intact. Existing repair techniques can produce structurally valid inputs, but they often rely on deletion or repeated search, which may lose original content and result in semantic incorrectness. This paper presents RepairFormer, a transformer-based framework for structured input repair. The approach formulates repair as a supervised sequence generation task and uses format tags, oracle validation, and boundary-localized repair to generate valid outputs while preserving content. The boundary workflow focuses generation on the detected fault region, reducing the input size, and supporting repair of longer files. In evaluation, RepairFormer achieves a 88% in repair and 94% in recovery, showing strongest content preservation when repairs are successful. Additional experiments on our benchmark shows RepairFormer repairs 97.57% and recovers 94.29% with 5x faster runtime compared to state of the art.
Abstract:Structured input files such as JSON, DOT, OBJ, INI, S-expression, and TinyC are widely used in software systems, but small corruptions can cause parsers to reject otherwise useful data. Repairing such inputs is important because malformed configuration, program, and data files can interrupt testing, analysis, deployment, and downstream automation even when most of the original content remains intact. Existing repair techniques can produce structurally valid inputs, but they often rely on deletion or repeated search, which may lose original content and result in semantic incorrectness. This paper presents RepairFormer, a transformer-based framework for structured input repair. The approach formulates repair as a supervised sequence generation task and uses format tags, oracle validation, and boundary-localized repair to generate valid outputs while preserving content. The boundary workflow focuses generation on the detected fault region, reducing the input size, and supporting repair of longer files. In evaluation, RepairFormer achieves a 88% in repair and 94% in recovery, showing strongest content preservation when repairs are successful. Additional experiments on our benchmark shows RepairFormer repairs 97.57% and recovers 94.29% with 5x faster runtime compared to state of the art.
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.05060 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2608.05060v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05060 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 281 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
SVRepair: Structured Visual Reasoning for Automated Program Repair
arXiv · 5 aug. 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · 27 aug. 2026
P(Anyone Builds It & Everyone Dies) = 0.62?
LessWrong · 16 oct. 2026

How a major freight railroad scaled pipeline creation with Genie Code
Databricks · 12 aug. 2026