Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This research introduces ReliaGate, a post-hoc reliability routing framework that determines whether to surface or withhold stress predictions from wearables without altering the underlying model. By integrating confidence scores and signal quality metrics, it addresses the trade-off between reducing error rates and preserving information availability in low-stakes scenarios. The study validates this approach across multiple datasets, offering an operational method for managing output distribution while avoiding clinical risk guarantees.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

ReliaGate: Reliability Routing for Low-Stakes Wearable Stress Prediction

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2608.15951v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study when a wearable stress system should surface a prediction rather than change it. In low-stakes reflection and summary settings, aggregate accuracy is insufficient because withholding can reduce error while leaving some people with little or no information. We formulate fixed-label reliability routing: after a locked classifier emits a protocol-defined stress/non-stress label, a post-hoc gate surfaces that unchanged label or withholds it as unavailable. ReliaGate assembles established confidence, signal-quality/trust, agreement, train-standardized atypicality, and train-fitted geometry cues into a post-hoc correctness score. We evaluate four wearable datasets using subject-disjoint folds, validation-selected routing, paired held-out-subject intervals, and pooled and per-subject analyses. WESAD point estimates favored ReliaGate, UBFC-Phys primary coverage/risk intervals favored ReliaGate, and E4 checks were mixed. ReliaGate provides an operational framework for studying surfaced-label error, output availability, and accepted-output distribution across subjects, without revising labels or providing clinical or finite-sample risk guarantees.

Abstract:We study when a wearable stress system should surface a prediction rather than change it. In low-stakes reflection and summary settings, aggregate accuracy is insufficient because withholding can reduce error while leaving some people with little or no information. We formulate fixed-label reliability routing: after a locked classifier emits a protocol-defined stress/non-stress label, a post-hoc gate surfaces that unchanged label or withholds it as unavailable. ReliaGate assembles established confidence, signal-quality/trust, agreement, train-standardized atypicality, and train-fitted geometry cues into a post-hoc correctness score. We evaluate four wearable datasets using subject-disjoint folds, validation-selected routing, paired held-out-subject intervals, and pooled and per-subject analyses. WESAD point estimates favored ReliaGate, UBFC-Phys primary coverage/risk intervals favored ReliaGate, and E4 checks were mixed. ReliaGate provides an operational framework for studying surfaced-label error, output availability, and accepted-output distribution across subjects, without revising labels or providing clinical or finite-sample risk guarantees.

Accepted at WellComp 2026, held with UbiComp/ISWC 2026. 7 pages, 4 tables, and 1 figure. To appear in UbiComp Companion '26. ACM DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3798063.3841770

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

arXiv:2608.15951 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.15951v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15951 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 187 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe