Reliable Sample-Level Quantum Error Mitigation via Dominance-Aware Clustering

arXiv:2609.01744v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many quantum algorithms for classically difficult optimization tasks must return high-quality bitstrings from finitely many circuit executions, whereas most quantum error-mitigation methods target expectation values. We study sample-level recovery when measured probability mass is distributed around multiple latent bitstrings, called centers. Each component of the measured probability mass is called a source and we assume that each center is associated with one source. We identify dominance-at every coordinate, more than half of a retained region's probability mass comes from one source and agrees with its center-as a sufficient condition under which majority voting recovers that center with exponentially decreasing error probability. We show that nearest-center assignment, as used in clustering algorithms such as the $k$-modes algorithm, can fail to produce dominated regions even when the true centers are known. This failure motivates responsibility thresholding and a local dominance screen, whose combination we call dominance-aware (DA) refinement. Synthetic and simulated MaxCut-QAOA experiments show that DA refinement favors precision, while $k$-modes with DA refinement improves overall center recovery. All procedures are classical post-processing and require no additional quantum-circuit executions.

Abstract:Many quantum algorithms for classically difficult optimization tasks must return high-quality bitstrings from finitely many circuit executions, whereas most quantum error-mitigation methods target expectation values. We study sample-level recovery when measured probability mass is distributed around multiple latent bitstrings, called centers. Each component of the measured probability mass is called a source and we assume that each center is associated with one source. We identify dominance-at every coordinate, more than half of a retained region's probability mass comes from one source and agrees with its center-as a sufficient condition under which majority voting recovers that center with exponentially decreasing error probability. We show that nearest-center assignment, as used in clustering algorithms such as the $k$-modes algorithm, can fail to produce dominated regions even when the true centers are known. This failure motivates responsibility thresholding and a local dominance screen, whose combination we call dominance-aware (DA) refinement. Synthetic and simulated MaxCut-QAOA experiments show that DA refinement favors precision, while $k$-modes with DA refinement improves overall center recovery. All procedures are classical post-processing and require no additional quantum-circuit executions.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Information Theory (cs.IT)

arXiv:2609.01744 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.01744v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01744 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

Reliable Sample-Level Quantum Error Mitigation via Dominance-Aware Clustering

Subiecte conexe