analiza aiqbench
This research refines Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) control theory for feedback cooling quantum harmonic oscillators by correcting the cost function to account for potential shifts induced by measurement. The study demonstrates that while current detection efficiencies make existing low-pass-filter methods nearly optimal, this redesigned approach offers significant advantages in reaching the motional ground state as detection efficiency approaches unity.
Redesigning the linear--quadratic--Gaussian cost function for feedback cooling of a quantum harmonic oscillator
arXiv:2609.18195v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Linear--quadratic--Gaussian (LQG) control is optimal only with respect to a prescribed cost function, the choice of which dictates the physical objective of the control. We consider feedback cooling of a continuously monitored quantum harmonic oscillator by shifting the minimum of its trapping potential. In this setting, the physically relevant cooling objective can be defined as minimizing the oscillator's energy relative to the feedback-shifted potential. In contrast, conventional LQG control evaluates the energy from a fixed origin and thus fails to directly optimize this quantity. To address this problem, we introduce a redesigned cost function that explicitly accounts for the feedback-induced shift of the potential. We then derive the corresponding optimal feedback law and obtain an analytic expression for the minimum achievable steady-state phonon occupation number. The redesigned LQG control achieves a lower occupation number than low-pass-filter (LPF) feedback formulated for the same cooling objective. While this improvement is minor at detection efficiencies currently attainable in experiments---indicating that LPF feedback already delivers near-optimal cooling performance---the advantage becomes pronounced as the detection efficiency approaches unity. In this regime, the redesigned LQG control provides an increasing advantage for reaching the motional ground state at a finite measurement strength. We clarify that the conventional and redesigned cost functions represent distinct control objectives rather than different implementations of the same optimization problem.
Abstract:Linear--quadratic--Gaussian (LQG) control is optimal only with respect to a prescribed cost function, the choice of which dictates the physical objective of the control. We consider feedback cooling of a continuously monitored quantum harmonic oscillator by shifting the minimum of its trapping potential. In this setting, the physically relevant cooling objective can be defined as minimizing the oscillator's energy relative to the feedback-shifted potential. In contrast, conventional LQG control evaluates the energy from a fixed origin and thus fails to directly optimize this quantity. To address this problem, we introduce a redesigned cost function that explicitly accounts for the feedback-induced shift of the potential. We then derive the corresponding optimal feedback law and obtain an analytic expression for the minimum achievable steady-state phonon occupation number. The redesigned LQG control achieves a lower occupation number than low-pass-filter (LPF) feedback formulated for the same cooling objective. While this improvement is minor at detection efficiencies currently attainable in experiments---indicating that LPF feedback already delivers near-optimal cooling performance---the advantage becomes pronounced as the detection efficiency approaches unity. In this regime, the redesigned LQG control provides an increasing advantage for reaching the motional ground state at a finite measurement strength. We clarify that the conventional and redesigned cost functions represent distinct control objectives rather than different implementations of the same optimization problem.
arXiv:2609.18195 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.18195v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18195 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 308 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Running Variational Quantum Eigensolver with Qiskit Aer on AMD Instinct
AMD · 29 mai 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 aug. 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · 8 oct. 2026

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · 27 sept. 2026