Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCalcul cuantic

analiza aiqbench

This research refines Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) control theory for feedback cooling quantum harmonic oscillators by correcting the cost function to account for potential shifts induced by measurement. The study demonstrates that while current detection efficiencies make existing low-pass-filter methods nearly optimal, this redesigned approach offers significant advantages in reaching the motional ground state as detection efficiency approaches unity.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Redesigning the linear--quadratic--Gaussian cost function for feedback cooling of a quantum harmonic oscillator

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.18195v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Linear--quadratic--Gaussian (LQG) control is optimal only with respect to a prescribed cost function, the choice of which dictates the physical objective of the control. We consider feedback cooling of a continuously monitored quantum harmonic oscillator by shifting the minimum of its trapping potential. In this setting, the physically relevant cooling objective can be defined as minimizing the oscillator's energy relative to the feedback-shifted potential. In contrast, conventional LQG control evaluates the energy from a fixed origin and thus fails to directly optimize this quantity. To address this problem, we introduce a redesigned cost function that explicitly accounts for the feedback-induced shift of the potential. We then derive the corresponding optimal feedback law and obtain an analytic expression for the minimum achievable steady-state phonon occupation number. The redesigned LQG control achieves a lower occupation number than low-pass-filter (LPF) feedback formulated for the same cooling objective. While this improvement is minor at detection efficiencies currently attainable in experiments---indicating that LPF feedback already delivers near-optimal cooling performance---the advantage becomes pronounced as the detection efficiency approaches unity. In this regime, the redesigned LQG control provides an increasing advantage for reaching the motional ground state at a finite measurement strength. We clarify that the conventional and redesigned cost functions represent distinct control objectives rather than different implementations of the same optimization problem.

Abstract:Linear--quadratic--Gaussian (LQG) control is optimal only with respect to a prescribed cost function, the choice of which dictates the physical objective of the control. We consider feedback cooling of a continuously monitored quantum harmonic oscillator by shifting the minimum of its trapping potential. In this setting, the physically relevant cooling objective can be defined as minimizing the oscillator's energy relative to the feedback-shifted potential. In contrast, conventional LQG control evaluates the energy from a fixed origin and thus fails to directly optimize this quantity. To address this problem, we introduce a redesigned cost function that explicitly accounts for the feedback-induced shift of the potential. We then derive the corresponding optimal feedback law and obtain an analytic expression for the minimum achievable steady-state phonon occupation number. The redesigned LQG control achieves a lower occupation number than low-pass-filter (LPF) feedback formulated for the same cooling objective. While this improvement is minor at detection efficiencies currently attainable in experiments---indicating that LPF feedback already delivers near-optimal cooling performance---the advantage becomes pronounced as the detection efficiency approaches unity. In this regime, the redesigned LQG control provides an increasing advantage for reaching the motional ground state at a finite measurement strength. We clarify that the conventional and redesigned cost functions represent distinct control objectives rather than different implementations of the same optimization problem.

arXiv:2609.18195 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.18195v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18195 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 308 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe