analiza aiqbench
This article introduces REBOOT, a novel benchmark for robot learning that treats failure episodes as primary data rather than discarding them. By providing paired recovery trajectories and phase-level annotations for precision assembly tasks, it directly addresses the limitations of current datasets that rely solely on successful demonstrations. This resource is critical for advancing robust machine learning policies in complex manipulation scenarios where binary success metrics obscure specific failure modes.
REBOOT: From Failure to Recovery - A Dataset and Benchmark for Precision Assembly
arXiv:2609.22591v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robot learning policies fail in characteristic ways: they stall in uncertain states, drift during contact-rich alignment, and miss targets by millimetres in precision tasks. Yet training datasets consist largely of successful demonstrations, while real-world benchmarks often reduce performance to binary success. This limits both supervision for recovery and analysis of where failures occur. We introduce REBOOT (Recovery Episode Benchmark for Off-nominal Trajectories), the first robot manipulation benchmark designed around failure as a first-class signal. REBOOT contains 2,160 demonstrations across 18 precision assembly tasks, each decomposed into five shared phases: Align(pick), Engage(pick), Transport, Align(place), and Engage(place), enabling phase-level evaluation beyond terminal success. Failures are introduced across phases and paired with expert recovery trajectories that return the system to a valid continuation state. Tasks are annotated with rotational symmetry, engagement-clearance precision tier, and assembly direction through matched install-remove pairs. Failure episodes are labeled by phase and categorical failure mode, enabling attribution to kinematic stage and tolerance violation. Data includes synchronized RGB-D observations from four viewpoints and grounded natural-language descriptions of phase-level success and failure conditions. Half the dataset contains expert demonstrations; the other half contains recovery demonstrations sampled to reflect failures observed in imitation-learned policy rollouts. We benchmark action-chunked transformer, diffusion, and $\pi_0$-FAST policies using phase-level completion rates, revealing model-specific failure points hidden by binary evaluation. Dataset and code: https://nanayawoa.github.io/REBOOT
Abstract:Robot learning policies fail in characteristic ways: they stall in uncertain states, drift during contact-rich alignment, and miss targets by millimetres in precision tasks. Yet training datasets consist largely of successful demonstrations, while real-world benchmarks often reduce performance to binary success. This limits both supervision for recovery and analysis of where failures occur. We introduce REBOOT (Recovery Episode Benchmark for Off-nominal Trajectories), the first robot manipulation benchmark designed around failure as a first-class signal. REBOOT contains 2,160 demonstrations across 18 precision assembly tasks, each decomposed into five shared phases: Align(pick), Engage(pick), Transport, Align(place), and Engage(place), enabling phase-level evaluation beyond terminal success. Failures are introduced across phases and paired with expert recovery trajectories that return the system to a valid continuation state. Tasks are annotated with rotational symmetry, engagement-clearance precision tier, and assembly direction through matched install-remove pairs. Failure episodes are labeled by phase and categorical failure mode, enabling attribution to kinematic stage and tolerance violation. Data includes synchronized RGB-D observations from four viewpoints and grounded natural-language descriptions of phase-level success and failure conditions. Half the dataset contains expert demonstrations; the other half contains recovery demonstrations sampled to reflect failures observed in imitation-learned policy rollouts. We benchmark action-chunked transformer, diffusion, and $\pi_0$-FAST policies using phase-level completion rates, revealing model-specific failure points hidden by binary evaluation. Dataset and code: this https URL
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.22591 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.22591v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22591 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 313 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · 4 sept. 2026

Building a Foundation Stack for General-Purpose Robots
IEEE Spectrum · 13 iul. 2026

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: from Principles to Practice
InfoQ · 29 mai 2026

Exploring self-distilled reasoning for supervised fine-tuning with Amazon Nova
AWS · 21 iul. 2026