analiza aiqbench
Raven addresses the inherent trade-off in linear-time sequence models between dense state updates, which cause interference, and sparse sliding-window attention, which suffers from hard eviction. By implementing learned routing to selectively update memory slots, this architecture preserves long-range context recall significantly better than standard SSMs or Transformers while maintaining computational efficiency. The approach offers a promising direction for scaling model contexts without sacrificing the ability to retrieve specific past information accurately.
Raven: High-Recall Sequence Modeling with Sparse Memory Routing
arXiv:2607.25357v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-context recall in linear-time sequence models highlights a tradeoff in how they write to memory. State-based linear models, such as state-space models (SSMs) and linear Transformers, write densely, updating the entire state for each newly arrived token, which leads to interference and makes specific past tokens hard to recover. Sliding-window attention (SWA) exhibits the opposite behavior: it writes sparsely by storing explicit token representations, but only within a fixed window, so recall drops once the relevant token is evicted. Interpolating between these models, we introduce Raven, a linear-time sequence model that maintains a fixed set of memory slots and, at each step, decays and updates only a selected subset via learned, input-dependent routing. This lets Raven mitigate SWA's position-based overwriting and hard eviction while reducing interference from dense state updates in SSMs, thereby preserving long-range content much more effectively. Across recall-intensive benchmarks, Raven is competitive with or outperforms prior linear-time baselines, achieving strong long-context recall where both SWA and SSMs sharply degrade. It remains effective when extrapolating to context lengths as large as 16x its training length, with similar gains in hybrid architectures.
Abstract:Long-context recall in linear-time sequence models highlights a tradeoff in how they write to memory. State-based linear models, such as state-space models (SSMs) and linear Transformers, write densely, updating the entire state for each newly arrived token, which leads to interference and makes specific past tokens hard to recover. Sliding-window attention (SWA) exhibits the opposite behavior: it writes sparsely by storing explicit token representations, but only within a fixed window, so recall drops once the relevant token is evicted. Interpolating between these models, we introduce Raven, a linear-time sequence model that maintains a fixed set of memory slots and, at each step, decays and updates only a selected subset via learned, input-dependent routing. This lets Raven mitigate SWA's position-based overwriting and hard eviction while reducing interference from dense state updates in SSMs, thereby preserving long-range content much more effectively. Across recall-intensive benchmarks, Raven is competitive with or outperforms prior linear-time baselines, achieving strong long-context recall where both SWA and SSMs sharply degrade. It remains effective when extrapolating to context lengths as large as 16x its training length, with similar gains in hybrid architectures.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.25357 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.25357v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.25357 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 280 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026

Can we change an AI model’s architecture without retraining it from scratch?
Amazon Science · 12 oct. 2026
How to build a cancer vaccine, and whether they will work this time
LessWrong · 8 iun. 2026