Sari la conținut

localeBeta.label localeBeta.notice localeBeta.readInEnglish

perspectiva aiqbenchCalcul cuantic

analiza aiqbench

Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.

Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Qudit-based scalable quantum algorithm for solving the integer programming problem

arXiv1 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2508.13906v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Integer programming (IP) is an NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem that is widely used to represent a diverse set of real-world problems spanning multiple fields, such as finance, engineering, logistics, and operations research. It is a hard problem to solve using classical algorithms, as its complexity increases with problem size. Most quantum algorithms for solving IP are highly resource-inefficient because they encode integers into qubits. In [1], the issue of resource inefficiency was addressed by mapping integer variables to qudits. However, [1] has limited practical value due to a lack of scalability to multiple qudits to encode larger problems. In this work, by extending upon the ideas of [1], a circuit-based scalable quantum algorithm is presented using multiple interacting qudits for which we show a quantum speed-up for solving the integer programming problem. The quantum algorithm consists of a distillation function that efficiently separates the feasible from the infeasible regions, a phase-amplitude encoding for the cost function, and a quantum phase estimation coupled with a multi-controlled single-qubit rotation for optimization. We prove that our algorithm yields the optimal solution with the maximum measurement probability. The time complexity for the quantum algorithm is shown to be $O(r_P(mn^2log d + d^{n/2}/N_{y_s}^{1/2} + n \epsilon_{\text{QPE}}^{-1}))$ for a problem with the number of variables $n$ taking $d$ integer values, satisfying $m$ constraints with a precision of $\epsilon_{\text{QPE}}$ and $r_P$ repetitions required for reaching a success probability $P$. Compared to the classical time complexity of brute force $O(d^n)$ and the classical exact algorithm $O((\log{n})^{O(n)})$, it incurs a reduction of $\sim d^{n/2}$ in the time complexity (for a polynomial number of repetitions and precision requirements) for solving a general polynomial IP problem.

Citește articolul complet pe arXiv

Subiecte conexe