analiza aiqbench
This research highlights a critical governance gap where divergent U.S. and EU regulatory approaches to quantum-safe accounting standards risk fragmenting global data assurance practices. For the tech sector, the study underscores that voluntary standards currently lack the harmonization necessary to prevent decoupling in security controls as quantum threats mature. The core takeaway is that institutional pressures will soon force a transition from market-driven innovation to coordinated regulatory frameworks to maintain the integrity of financial data systems.
Quantum Computing Standards & Accounting Information Systems
arXiv:2311.11925v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advancements in quantum technology threaten the cryptographic foundations of Accounting Information Systems (AIS), necessitating a transition to quantum-safe standards. This paper investigates why quantum standards fall within the purview of accounting by framing them as essential institutional governance mechanisms that ensure the integrity, auditability, and legitimacy of data. Utilizing neo-institutional theory, the study analyzes how coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures drive the adoption of these standards across jurisdictions. Through a structured documentary analysis of major standard-setting bodies, the research identifies significant divergence between U.S. and EU/European approaches: U.S. standards emphasize market-driven innovation and pragmatic legitimacy, while EU and Pan-European standards prioritize regulatory harmonization and societal privacy objectives. The findings suggest that while these standards are currently voluntary, their inconsistent implementation creates risks of decoupling and fragmented assurance practices, challenging the global comparability of AIS security controls.
arXiv:2311.11925 (physics)
Abstract:Recent advancements in quantum technology threaten the cryptographic foundations of Accounting Information Systems (AIS), necessitating a transition to quantum-safe standards. This paper investigates why quantum standards fall within the purview of accounting by framing them as essential institutional governance mechanisms that ensure the integrity, auditability, and legitimacy of data. Utilizing neo-institutional theory, the study analyzes how coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures drive the adoption of these standards across jurisdictions. Through a structured documentary analysis of major standard-setting bodies, the research identifies significant divergence between U.S. and EU/European approaches: U.S. standards emphasize market-driven innovation and pragmatic legitimacy, while EU and Pan-European standards prioritize regulatory harmonization and societal privacy objectives. The findings suggest that while these standards are currently voluntary, their inconsistent implementation creates risks of decoupling and fragmented assurance practices, challenging the global comparability of AIS security controls.
Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
arXiv:2311.11925 [physics.soc-ph]
(or arXiv:2311.11925v2 [physics.soc-ph] for this version)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 229 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 aug. 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026

NIST’s Andrew Regenscheid Explains the Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography
The Quantum Insider · 30 iul. 2026

IBM Computing Legacy, The Complete Story From 1890 To Quantum Computing
Quantum Zeitgeist · 3 aug. 2026