analiza aiqbench
This research introduces QGLAS, a method for open-ended reinforcement learning that decouples response quality from length to improve token efficiency without compromising performance. By applying bounded bonuses only to concise responses with positive advantages, the approach achieves significant compression while retaining near-total quality gains across various model families and benchmarks. The work addresses a critical challenge in scaling language models: preventing reward shaping from inadvertently encouraging verbosity at the expense of utility.
Quality Determines Direction, Length Shapes Magnitude: Length Control for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2609.34718v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) changes not only what language models say, but also how much they say, often increasing response length at the cost of token efficiency. Controlling this length growth is particularly challenging in open-ended RL because (i) response length is entangled with quality, (ii) open-ended tasks lack a natural success boundary for deciding when efficiency should be prioritized, and (iii) dense, graded rewards often yield small within-group quality margins, making quality-induced advantages especially sensitive to reward-level length shaping, which can perturb their magnitudes and even reverse their signs. We therefore adopt an asymmetric principle: quality should determine the direction of reinforcement, while length should only shape its magnitude. We instantiate this principle with Quality-Gated Length Advantage Shaping (QGLAS), which first computes advantages from quality rewards alone, then adds bounded bonuses only to shorter positive-advantage responses, leaving all other advantages unchanged. The bonus strength is further adapted to within-group quality separation, allowing conciseness to matter more when quality-favored responses are similar and less when their quality differences are clear. Across different model families, open-ended benchmarks, and reward sources, QGLAS consistently achieves a stronger quality--length trade-off than representative baselines. At approximately 30% compression, QGLAS retains 98.4--102.0% of the macro-average quality gains achieved by quality-only RL over the base model, compared with 68.3--75.5% for these baselines at comparable compression.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) changes not only what language models say, but also how much they say, often increasing response length at the cost of token efficiency. Controlling this length growth is particularly challenging in open-ended RL because (i) response length is entangled with quality, (ii) open-ended tasks lack a natural success boundary for deciding when efficiency should be prioritized, and (iii) dense, graded rewards often yield small within-group quality margins, making quality-induced advantages especially sensitive to reward-level length shaping, which can perturb their magnitudes and even reverse their signs. We therefore adopt an asymmetric principle: quality should determine the direction of reinforcement, while length should only shape its magnitude. We instantiate this principle with Quality-Gated Length Advantage Shaping (QGLAS), which first computes advantages from quality rewards alone, then adds bounded bonuses only to shorter positive-advantage responses, leaving all other advantages unchanged. The bonus strength is further adapted to within-group quality separation, allowing conciseness to matter more when quality-favored responses are similar and less when their quality differences are clear. Across different model families, open-ended benchmarks, and reward sources, QGLAS consistently achieves a stronger quality--length trade-off than representative baselines. At approximately 30% compression, QGLAS retains 98.4--102.0% of the macro-average quality gains achieved by quality-only RL over the base model, compared with 68.3--75.5% for these baselines at comparable compression.
22 pages. Preprint, under review
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.34718 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.34718v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34718 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 320 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

AXRP Episode 50 - Eli Lifland on AI 2027
LessWrong · 3 aug. 2026
Dropless MoE Training in JAX with Primus-Turbo
AMD · 10 iun. 2026

The art and science of hyperparameter optimization on Amazon Nova Forge
AWS · 2 iun. 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · 21 iul. 2026