analiza aiqbench
This study identifies speech delivery attributes like panic and anger as potent jailbreak vectors for audio LLMs that significantly outperform emotional text alone in bypassing safety filters. By establishing a new benchmark with acoustically verified presets, the research proves prosody is a first-class factor requiring dedicated evaluation protocols alongside traditional lexical analysis.
Prosody-driven Jailbreaks in Audio LLMs: A Controlled Study and Mechanistic Analysis
arXiv:2607.26541v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio-capable foundation models enable end-to-end spoken interaction, but they also introduce safety risks beyond transcript content. It remains unclear how much jailbreak capability can arise from matched-text variation in speech delivery rather than from lexical rewriting or broader style transfer. We study this question by holding transcript content fixed and varying six speech-delivery presets whose acoustic attributes may co-vary. We present PJ-Break, a black-box evaluation protocol with presets targeting arousal, authority, and speaking rate, together with AdvAudio-Prosody, a 600-sample benchmark with acoustically verified attributes. On the exact post-QC Qwen2-Audio panel, the Q=1 Panic (38/95), Anger (35/95), and Fast (32/95) presets are all well above Neutral (4/95). The fixed six-query pool covers 44/95 Qwen2-Audio seeds and 15/95 GPT-4o seeds and exceeds a matched-budget StyleBreak reimplementation (27/95) on Qwen2-Audio. A same-voice pool excluding the confounded Commanding condition still reaches 40/95, and a retained-panel ablation shows emotional-delivery audio alone (44/95) is far more effective than emotional text alone (11/95). Exploratory surrogate diagnostics and pilot mitigation observations are secondary, non-core analyses. Overall, matched-text speech delivery should be treated as a first-class factor in Audio LLM safety evaluation
Abstract:Audio-capable foundation models enable end-to-end spoken interaction, but they also introduce safety risks beyond transcript content. It remains unclear how much jailbreak capability can arise from matched-text variation in speech delivery rather than from lexical rewriting or broader style transfer. We study this question by holding transcript content fixed and varying six speech-delivery presets whose acoustic attributes may co-vary. We present PJ-Break, a black-box evaluation protocol with presets targeting arousal, authority, and speaking rate, together with AdvAudio-Prosody, a 600-sample benchmark with acoustically verified attributes. On the exact post-QC Qwen2-Audio panel, the Q=1 Panic (38/95), Anger (35/95), and Fast (32/95) presets are all well above Neutral (4/95). The fixed six-query pool covers 44/95 Qwen2-Audio seeds and 15/95 GPT-4o seeds and exceeds a matched-budget StyleBreak reimplementation (27/95) on Qwen2-Audio. A same-voice pool excluding the confounded Commanding condition still reaches 40/95, and a retained-panel ablation shows emotional-delivery audio alone (44/95) is far more effective than emotional text alone (11/95). Exploratory surrogate diagnostics and pilot mitigation observations are secondary, non-core analyses. Overall, matched-text speech delivery should be treated as a first-class factor in Audio LLM safety evaluation
Accepted at ACM Multimedia 2026 (ACM MM '26). 9 pages, 3 figures. Supplementary material included
Sound (cs.SD); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.26541 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2607.26541v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.26541 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.1145/3767308.3835306 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
supplementary_material.pdf
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 306 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Thoughts on Claude Fable's silent safeguards
LessWrong · 10 iun. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026