analiza aiqbench
This research introduces progressive cramming as a method to probe the fundamental limits of token compression within large language models by dynamically adjusting reconstruction budgets. The study reveals that achieving near-perfect sequence reconstruction relies on brittle steering mechanisms rather than transferable semantics, significantly degrading model capabilities even when original context is preserved. These findings are critical for understanding whether current embedding spaces can support meaningful information density without compromising generative performance.
Progressive Cramming: Reliable Token Compression and What It Reveals
arXiv:2607.21231v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Token cramming compresses sequences into learned embeddings with near-perfect reconstruction, but fixed token budgets and 99\% accuracy thresholds leave it unclear whether residual errors reflect optimization failures or fundamental limits. We introduce progressive cramming, which grows the target prefix token-by-token, stopping only when reconstruction is no longer achievable within a fixed optimization budget. Progressive trajectories occupy low-dimensional structure in embedding space. Prepending a crammed embedding causes a moderate but consistent accuracy drop on multiple-choice benchmarks even with the original prefix in context, and collapses capability almost entirely under generative evaluation. Causal attention-knockout interventions trace this degradation to the embedding's interactions in the model's early layers. These results position progressive cramming as a tool for studying compression limits and show that perfect reconstruction - achievable through brittle steering rather than transferable semantics - is insufficient for meaningful compression.
Abstract:Token cramming compresses sequences into learned embeddings with near-perfect reconstruction, but fixed token budgets and 99\% accuracy thresholds leave it unclear whether residual errors reflect optimization failures or fundamental limits. We introduce progressive cramming, which grows the target prefix token-by-token, stopping only when reconstruction is no longer achievable within a fixed optimization budget. Progressive trajectories occupy low-dimensional structure in embedding space. Prepending a crammed embedding causes a moderate but consistent accuracy drop on multiple-choice benchmarks even with the original prefix in context, and collapses capability almost entirely under generative evaluation. Causal attention-knockout interventions trace this degradation to the embedding's interactions in the model's early layers. These results position progressive cramming as a tool for studying compression limits and show that perfect reconstruction - achievable through brittle steering rather than transferable semantics - is insufficient for meaningful compression.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.21231 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.21231v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21231 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 232 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026
The Case Against Slowing Down AI
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026