analiza aiqbench
This study evaluates eight frontier Multimodal Large Language Models against a curated dataset of Chinese short-video misinformation, revealing significant susceptibility to cognitive biases such as authoritative channel IDs. While Gemini-2.5-Pro demonstrated the highest robustness with a belief score of 71.5/100, the results highlight critical vulnerabilities in current MLLMs when processing deceptive visual experiments and logical fallacies. The findings underscore the urgent need for improved evaluation frameworks that account for social cues and evidence verification in health-related misinformation contexts.
Probing Multimodal Large Language Models on Cognitive Biases in Chinese Short-Video Misinformation
arXiv:2601.06600v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Short-video platforms have become major channels for misinformation, where deceptive claims frequently leverage visual experiments and social cues. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities, their robustness against misinformation entangled with cognitive biases remains under-explored. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework using a high-quality, manually annotated dataset of 200 short videos spanning four health domains. This dataset provides fine-grained annotations for three deceptive patterns-experimental errors, logical fallacies, and fabricated claims-each verified by evidence such as national standards and academic literature. We evaluate eight frontier MLLMs across five modality settings. Experimental results demonstrate that Gemini-2.5-Pro achieves the highest performance in the multimodal setting with a belief score of 71.5/100, while o3 performs the worst at 35.2. Furthermore, we investigate social cues that induce false beliefs in videos and find that models are susceptible to biases like authoritative channel IDs.
Abstract:Short-video platforms have become major channels for misinformation, where deceptive claims frequently leverage visual experiments and social cues. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities, their robustness against misinformation entangled with cognitive biases remains under-explored. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework using a high-quality, manually annotated dataset of 200 short videos spanning four health domains. This dataset provides fine-grained annotations for three deceptive patterns-experimental errors, logical fallacies, and fabricated claims-each verified by evidence such as national standards and academic literature. We evaluate eight frontier MLLMs across five modality settings. Experimental results demonstrate that Gemini-2.5-Pro achieves the highest performance in the multimodal setting with a belief score of 71.5/100, while o3 performs the worst at 35.2. Furthermore, we investigate social cues that induce false beliefs in videos and find that models are susceptible to biases like authoritative channel IDs.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2601.06600 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2601.06600v4 [cs.CL] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 157 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026
MagiC: Evaluating Multimodal Cognition Toward Grounded Visual Reasoning
arXiv · 16 oct. 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026