Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research introduces PSAP, a structured pruning technique that enhances the reliability of neural networks operating under homomorphic encryption by targeting fault-tolerant regions. By jointly optimizing weight magnitude and polynomial activation sensitivity, the method significantly reduces catastrophic accuracy drops during bit-flip injections while lowering computational overhead for encrypted inference. The work bridges critical gaps between AI model efficiency and cryptographic security constraints in privacy-preserving machine learning scenarios.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

PRISM: Sensitivity-Aware PolynoMial PRuning for EffIcient Neural Network Encryption

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2607.18342v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Structured pruning is essential for making neural network inference feasible under homomorphic encryption (HE), yet its impact on model reliability has remained unexplored. This paper presents a systematic reliability characterization of pruned CKKS-encrypted neural networks and introduces Polynomial-Sensitivity-Aware Pruning (PSAP), a structured pruning method that is inherently reliability-aware. PSAP scores filters jointly by weight magnitude, polynomial activation sensitivity, and rotation cost, which concentrates pruning in fault-tolerant regions. Across two architectures, two datasets, two numerical representations, and five bit-error rates (40 full-model and 108 per-layer experiments), PSAP-pruned models limit catastrophic (>10 pp accuracy drop) layers to at most two versus 5--14 for magnitude-pruned baselines, reducing worst-case vulnerability by up to 29 times under int32 bit-flip injection. Direct CKKS encrypted fault injection indicates a safe operating boundary near BER~ 10^{-5}, supporting int32 injection as a conservative reliability proxy. The fault-critical structural layers account for only 1.1% of parameters, enabling selective hardening at minimal overhead. These reliability gains are obtained alongside competitive efficiency: PSAP reduces Halevi--Shoup rotations by up to 45.2\% on ResNet-32, and an adaptive mixed-degree allocation scheme lowers multiplicative depth from 66 to 56 levels, enabling leveled inference without bootstrapping.

Abstract:Structured pruning is essential for making neural network inference feasible under homomorphic encryption (HE), yet its impact on model reliability has remained unexplored. This paper presents a systematic reliability characterization of pruned CKKS-encrypted neural networks and introduces Polynomial-Sensitivity-Aware Pruning (PSAP), a structured pruning method that is inherently reliability-aware. PSAP scores filters jointly by weight magnitude, polynomial activation sensitivity, and rotation cost, which concentrates pruning in fault-tolerant regions. Across two architectures, two datasets, two numerical representations, and five bit-error rates (40 full-model and 108 per-layer experiments), PSAP-pruned models limit catastrophic (>10 pp accuracy drop) layers to at most two versus 5--14 for magnitude-pruned baselines, reducing worst-case vulnerability by up to 29 times under int32 bit-flip injection. Direct CKKS encrypted fault injection indicates a safe operating boundary near BER~ 10^{-5}, supporting int32 injection as a conservative reliability proxy. The fault-critical structural layers account for only 1.1% of parameters, enabling selective hardening at minimal overhead. These reliability gains are obtained alongside competitive efficiency: PSAP reduces Halevi--Shoup rotations by up to 45.2\% on ResNet-32, and an adaptive mixed-degree allocation scheme lowers multiplicative depth from 66 to 56 levels, enabling leveled inference without bootstrapping.

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Hardware Architecture (cs.AR); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2607.18342 [cs.CR]

(or arXiv:2607.18342v1 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18342 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 223 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe