analiza aiqbench
This paper presents a novel shadow tomography algorithm optimized for the average-case setting, leveraging prior distributions to estimate multiple observables with fewer quantum state copies than traditional worst-case methods. However, the authors identify an inherent limitation where this approach cannot amplify success against measurement randomness, leaving a logarithmic factor gap between quantum and classical complexity.
Pretty good shadow tomography
arXiv:2610.06781v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We give a shadow tomography algorithm that uses $O(\log(m) \log(m/\delta) / \varepsilon^2)$ copies of the input state. Specifically, given a quantum state $\rho$ and observables $O_1,\ldots,O_m$, the algorithm outputs estimates of $\mathrm{tr}(O_i\rho)$ for all $i\in[m]$ that are all accurate to within $\pm\varepsilon$, except with probability at most $\delta$. The key idea is to work in the average-case setting: for a random state drawn from a known prior, a pretty good measurement on $O(\log(m)/\varepsilon^2)$ copies gives a constant-error guarantee on all but a small fraction of the prior. Boosting this guarantee gives an average-case shadow tomography algorithm, and the minimax principle then (non-constructively) implies the existence of a measurement with the same worst-case guarantee. We also identify an obstruction to further improvement with this approach. While pretty good measurements amplify success over the randomness of the prior, they do not amplify success over the randomness of measurement. This issue appears to be inherent, and gives rise to the remaining $\log(m)$ factor separating the complexity of the quantum problem from its classical counterpart.
Abstract:We give a shadow tomography algorithm that uses $O(\log(m) \log(m/\delta) / \varepsilon^2)$ copies of the input state. Specifically, given a quantum state $\rho$ and observables $O_1,\ldots,O_m$, the algorithm outputs estimates of $\mathrm{tr}(O_i\rho)$ for all $i\in[m]$ that are all accurate to within $\pm\varepsilon$, except with probability at most $\delta$. The key idea is to work in the average-case setting: for a random state drawn from a known prior, a pretty good measurement on $O(\log(m)/\varepsilon^2)$ copies gives a constant-error guarantee on all but a small fraction of the prior. Boosting this guarantee gives an average-case shadow tomography algorithm, and the minimax principle then (non-constructively) implies the existence of a measurement with the same worst-case guarantee. We also identify an obstruction to further improvement with this approach. While pretty good measurements amplify success over the randomness of the prior, they do not amplify success over the randomness of measurement. This issue appears to be inherent, and gives rise to the remaining $\log(m)$ factor separating the complexity of the quantum problem from its classical counterpart.
arXiv:2610.06781 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.06781v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06781 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 262 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Dimension-Free Polylogarithmic Quantum Shadow Tomography from Sequential Pretty-Good Measurements
arXiv · 7 aug. 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026