analiza aiqbench
This research addresses critical preference instability in reward models, where subtle input perturbations trigger contradictory judgments despite preserving semantic meaning. By leveraging Sparse Autoencoders to isolate brittle features, the authors introduce inference-time mitigation strategies that significantly reduce errors on harmlessness and hallucination benchmarks without requiring model retraining. These findings offer a practical pathway to enhance the robustness and reliability of alignment systems in large language models.
Preference Instability in Reward Models: Detection and Mitigation via Sparse Autoencoders
arXiv:2605.16339v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Preference learning in large language models relies on reward models as proxies for human judgment. However, these models frequently exhibit preference instability, producing contradictory preference assignments in response to subtle, meaning-preserving input variations. We analyze this instability at the representation level under three semantic-preserving perturbation types: paraphrasing, pattern injection, and backdoor triggers. We attribute this instability to over-reliance on predictive yet brittle features, which we term unstable features, and isolate them via Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) in a sparse latent space where benign and perturbed inputs activate distinctly separable patterns. Building on this separability, we propose two SAE-based instability mitigation strategies: SAE Feature Steering, which identifies and suppresses anomalously activated features at inference, and SAE Residual Correction, which learns adaptive adjustments over SAE features to restore correct preferences. Our methods substantially reduce incorrect preference assignments on harmlessness and hallucination benchmarks while preserving benign performance and general utility on other tasks, without retraining the reward model.
Abstract:Preference learning in large language models relies on reward models as proxies for human judgment. However, these models frequently exhibit preference instability, producing contradictory preference assignments in response to subtle, meaning-preserving input variations. We analyze this instability at the representation level under three semantic-preserving perturbation types: paraphrasing, pattern injection, and backdoor triggers. We attribute this instability to over-reliance on predictive yet brittle features, which we term unstable features, and isolate them via Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) in a sparse latent space where benign and perturbed inputs activate distinctly separable patterns. Building on this separability, we propose two SAE-based instability mitigation strategies: SAE Feature Steering, which identifies and suppresses anomalously activated features at inference, and SAE Residual Correction, which learns adaptive adjustments over SAE features to restore correct preferences. Our methods substantially reduce incorrect preference assignments on harmlessness and hallucination benchmarks while preserving benign performance and general utility on other tasks, without retraining the reward model.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.16339 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.16339v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16339 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 246 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Comment on Measuring Reward-Seeking by Instilling Contrastive Beliefs paper from mechanistic interpretability perspective
LessWrong · 22 iul. 2026

The Model Organism Lottery: Model Organism Interpretability Strongly Depends on Training Methodology
LessWrong · 23 iul. 2026

Thousand-dimensional structure
AI Alignment Forum · 30 iul. 2026
BiasReducer: Adaptive Bias Mitigation for Reward Models
arXiv · 30 sept. 2026