analiza aiqbench
This paper is theoretical machine learning work on online learning with expert advice. It shows that when losses are heavy-tailed (finite only up to a $(1+\epsilon)$ moment with $\epsilon<1$), existing methods tuned for the $\epsilon=1$ case can be suboptimal, and it derives a minimax regret rate. It also proposes algorithms that reach that rate without knowing $\epsilon$ or $\theta$ in advance. For ML readers, the practical relevance is in robust online decision-making under noisy, outlier-prone feedback, though the results are asymptotic bounds rather than empirical evidence.
Prediction with Expert Advice under Heavy-Tailed Losses
arXiv:2610.14904v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study prediction with expert advice over $T$ rounds with $K$ experts under heavy-tailed losses whose $(1+\epsilon)$-moment is bounded by $\theta>0$ for some $\epsilon\in(0,1]$. In this setting, existing algorithms designed for the case $\epsilon=1$ can be suboptimal when $\epsilon<1$, suffering an additional polynomial dependence on $K$. We characterize the minimax pseudo-regret rate as $\Theta((\theta T)^{\frac{1}{1+\epsilon}}(\log K)^{\frac{\epsilon}{1+\epsilon}})$ and establish gap-dependent lower bounds in a self-bounded environment. To attain this minimax rate without prior knowledge of either $\epsilon$ or $\theta$, we propose Adaptive Heavy-Tailed FTRL, which uses robust data-dependent scale adaptation together with truncation. We further develop Adaptive Heavy-Tailed OMD, which likewise requires neither $\epsilon$ nor $\theta$ and achieves near-optimal regret guarantees in both adversarial and self-bounded environments. Finally, when $\epsilon$ and $\theta$ are known, an FTRL algorithm with Shannon-entropy regularization achieves optimal regret guarantees in both environments.
Abstract:We study prediction with expert advice over $T$ rounds with $K$ experts under heavy-tailed losses whose $(1+\epsilon)$-moment is bounded by $\theta>0$ for some $\epsilon\in(0,1]$. In this setting, existing algorithms designed for the case $\epsilon=1$ can be suboptimal when $\epsilon<1$, suffering an additional polynomial dependence on $K$. We characterize the minimax pseudo-regret rate as $\Theta((\theta T)^{\frac{1}{1+\epsilon}}(\log K)^{\frac{\epsilon}{1+\epsilon}})$ and establish gap-dependent lower bounds in a self-bounded environment. To attain this minimax rate without prior knowledge of either $\epsilon$ or $\theta$, we propose Adaptive Heavy-Tailed FTRL, which uses robust data-dependent scale adaptation together with truncation. We further develop Adaptive Heavy-Tailed OMD, which likewise requires neither $\epsilon$ nor $\theta$ and achieves near-optimal regret guarantees in both adversarial and self-bounded environments. Finally, when $\epsilon$ and $\theta$ are known, an FTRL algorithm with Shannon-entropy regularization achieves optimal regret guarantees in both environments.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2610.14904 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.14904v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14904 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 233 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
DI Series: Serving Kimi-K3 MXFP4 Wide-EP Disaggregated on AMD Instinct MI300X and MI325X
AMD · 8 oct. 2026
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · 11 iul. 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · 27 sept. 2026
Optimizing ATOM and vLLM-ATOM for High-Interactivity Inference
AMD · 1 sept. 2026