analiza aiqbench
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
Predictable Scaling: Efficient Model Exploration via Scaling-Law Prediction
arXiv:2610.23453v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating candidate changes (hypotheses) to recommendation models requires full-scale training runs consuming thousands of GPU-hours, severely limiting the hypothesis space engineers can feasibly explore. We introduce Predictable Scaling (PS), a systematic framework that exploits empirically verified regularity conditions to predict full-scale model performance from small-scale proxies. PS constructs scaled-down variants via composable scaling functions along distinct resource axes, and projects metrics to the target scale via curve fitting with calibrated uncertainty estimates. We compare three prediction strategies of increasing expressiveness: even the simplest (raw proxy) achieves prediction error within the empirical noise floor of repeated-run variance; the most expressive (Gaussian Process) provides an indicative 15% relative MAE improvement and calibrated uncertainty. Evaluation on two ranking models of increasing complexity---a task-specific model and a foundation model---demonstrates that PS correctly ranks actionable hypotheses across diverse hypothesis types at 79-88% compute reductions.
Abstract:Evaluating candidate changes (hypotheses) to recommendation models requires full-scale training runs consuming thousands of GPU-hours, severely limiting the hypothesis space engineers can feasibly explore. We introduce Predictable Scaling (PS), a systematic framework that exploits empirically verified regularity conditions to predict full-scale model performance from small-scale proxies. PS constructs scaled-down variants via composable scaling functions along distinct resource axes, and projects metrics to the target scale via curve fitting with calibrated uncertainty estimates. We compare three prediction strategies of increasing expressiveness: even the simplest (raw proxy) achieves prediction error within the empirical noise floor of repeated-run variance; the most expressive (Gaussian Process) provides an indicative 15% relative MAE improvement and calibrated uncertainty. Evaluation on two ranking models of increasing complexity---a task-specific model and a foundation model---demonstrates that PS correctly ranks actionable hypotheses across diverse hypothesis types at 79-88% compute reductions.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.23453 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.23453v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.23453 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 233 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

How can LLM RL Work Despite Information-Theoretic Inefficiency
LessWrong · 16 oct. 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · 27 aug. 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · 21 mai 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · 23 sept. 2026