analiza aiqbench
This research introduces PPL-Factory, a novel data selection framework that leverages task-aware perplexity scores to optimize large language model fine-tuning efficiency. By distinguishing between the learning objectives of standard modeling and reasoning tasks, it achieves superior performance on benchmarks like GSM8K and MATH using significantly reduced training datasets. The study highlights critical advancements in making AI development more computationally sustainable without sacrificing accuracy.
PPL-Factory: Task-Aware and Budget-Aware Data Selection from Language Modeling to Reasoning
arXiv:2607.18199v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Not all training samples contribute equally to large language model fine-tuning. Selecting informative training samples can reduce the computational cost while preserving downstream performance. Many existing data selection methods rely on indirect heuristics, such as data quality, diversity or reasoning trace length. However, the effectiveness of these fixed criteria is task-dependent and difficult to generalize across diverse downstream tasks. Perplexity-based data selection provides a simple and model-aware solution to estimate the sample difficulty, but existing approaches typically score the entire training sequence and ignore the difference in learning objectives of language modeling and reasoning tasks. In this paper, we propose PPL-Factory, a simple and interpretable data selection framework that combines task-aware perplexity-based scores and data budget-aware selection criteria. Experiments on GSM8K demonstrate that PPL-Factory outperforms other state-of-the-art data selection methods using only $1\%$ of the training set. With $10\%$ of the data, PPL-Factory exceeds full-data fine-tuning accuracy by 0.9 on GSM8K and 4.8 on MATH. Overall, our results demonstrate that task-aware and budget-aware perplexity-based selection provides an effective and applicable approach for efficient fine-tuning.
Abstract:Not all training samples contribute equally to large language model fine-tuning. Selecting informative training samples can reduce the computational cost while preserving downstream performance. Many existing data selection methods rely on indirect heuristics, such as data quality, diversity or reasoning trace length. However, the effectiveness of these fixed criteria is task-dependent and difficult to generalize across diverse downstream tasks. Perplexity-based data selection provides a simple and model-aware solution to estimate the sample difficulty, but existing approaches typically score the entire training sequence and ignore the difference in learning objectives of language modeling and reasoning tasks. In this paper, we propose PPL-Factory, a simple and interpretable data selection framework that combines task-aware perplexity-based scores and data budget-aware selection criteria. Experiments on GSM8K demonstrate that PPL-Factory outperforms other state-of-the-art data selection methods using only $1\%$ of the training set. With $10\%$ of the data, PPL-Factory exceeds full-data fine-tuning accuracy by 0.9 on GSM8K and 4.8 on MATH. Overall, our results demonstrate that task-aware and budget-aware perplexity-based selection provides an effective and applicable approach for efficient fine-tuning.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.18199 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.18199v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18199 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 272 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026
The hard physics and complex economics of AI’s insatiable hunger for power
SiliconANGLE · 11 sept. 2026

Can we change an AI model’s architecture without retraining it from scratch?
Amazon Science · 12 oct. 2026