analiza aiqbench
This paper examines a common shortcut for building end-to-end digital twins: fitting separate stage models and chaining their predictions, which can give overconfident intervals. It shows that a standard Monte Carlo propagation scheme yields inflated widths and input-dependent bias, and proposes a model-based bootstrap that brings coverage closer to nominal and tightens intervals in simulated linear-quadratic chains. Readers building multi-stage ML pipelines should note that these results come from controlled simulations with small training sets, so they support the method's promise in that setting rather than its general reliability.
Post-Inference Model Chaining: A Problem Statement and a Model-based Bootstrap for Training End-to-End Digital Twins
arXiv:2611.05225v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: End-to-end digital twins can be constructed by fitting separate stage models and connecting them after inference. We investigate the Frequentist prediction properties of a commonly used Monte Carlo simulation scheme that forwards complete predictive draws through such a chain when measured stage outputs contain independent normal errors, but the latent stage means are deterministic. Analytical two-stage examples show persistent asymptotic interval and coverage inflation and, with quadratic propagation, mean bias dependent on the parameters to be estimated. Simulations of four- and eight-stage linear-quadratic univariate chains with 7, 15 or 30 training runs demonstrate pronounced input-dependent distortions. A diagnostic using error-free latent training predictors shows that the effect is mainly not attributable to errors in variables, but to the MCSim approach even showing underestimation of coverage. We propose a model-based bootstrap: an initial chain forwards fitted means, bootstrap chains are refitted on fixed-center bootstrap data while forwarding their mean prediction, and a target-stage future error enters a studentized prediction root. Across the investigated scenarios, relative mean bias is substantially reduced, and coverage is closer to the nominal 90%. At sample size 30, the eight-stage bootstrap has mean width ratios of 1.16-1.42 relative to the known-parameter normal reference, compared with 4.11-4.97 for observed-to-observed MCSim. These results support improved endpoint prediction in the tested setting. Further investigations of the bootstrap scheme in the supplement for a bivariate 6-stage process show similar satisfactory results.
Abstract:End-to-end digital twins can be constructed by fitting separate stage models and connecting them after inference. We investigate the Frequentist prediction properties of a commonly used Monte Carlo simulation scheme that forwards complete predictive draws through such a chain when measured stage outputs contain independent normal errors, but the latent stage means are deterministic. Analytical two-stage examples show persistent asymptotic interval and coverage inflation and, with quadratic propagation, mean bias dependent on the parameters to be estimated. Simulations of four- and eight-stage linear-quadratic univariate chains with 7, 15 or 30 training runs demonstrate pronounced input-dependent distortions. A diagnostic using error-free latent training predictors shows that the effect is mainly not attributable to errors in variables, but to the MCSim approach even showing underestimation of coverage. We propose a model-based bootstrap: an initial chain forwards fitted means, bootstrap chains are refitted on fixed-center bootstrap data while forwarding their mean prediction, and a target-stage future error enters a studentized prediction root. Across the investigated scenarios, relative mean bias is substantially reduced, and coverage is closer to the nominal 90%. At sample size 30, the eight-stage bootstrap has mean width ratios of 1.16-1.42 relative to the known-parameter normal reference, compared with 4.11-4.97 for observed-to-observed MCSim. These results support improved endpoint prediction in the tested setting. Further investigations of the bootstrap scheme in the supplement for a bivariate 6-stage process show similar satisfactory results.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Methodology (stat.ME)
arXiv:2611.05225 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2611.05225v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05225 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 326 cuvinte