Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchAI & societate

analiza aiqbench

This paper challenges the applicability of the classical Second Welfare Theorem in post-AGI contexts where autonomy rights and self-modifying agents disrupt standard commodity assumptions. It proposes a revised framework requiring specific conditions—such as stable moral status and governed self-modification—to ensure that Pareto optima remain certifiably decentralizable. The work distinguishes between economic preference superposition and neural feature superposition, offering a theoretical foundation for economic modeling in advanced AI systems.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv

Post-AGI Economies: Superposition and the Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2606.08267v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The classical Second Welfare Theorem decentralizes any Pareto efficient allocation through prices and transfers under convexity and regularity. In post AGI economies, autonomy rights, self-modification, identity continuity, and superposed preferences need not behave as commodities or define a stable welfare relation, so this reduction may fail even when a supporting hyperplane exists. We give an autonomy-qualified Second Welfare Theorem stating the joint conditions convexity, stable moral status, non-fungible rights, welfare selection, non manipulation, governed self modification, and verification under which an autonomy Pareto optimum remains certifiably decentralizable, distinguishing economic preference superposition, a hypothesis about context-indexed choice, from neural feature superposition.

Abstract:The classical Second Welfare Theorem decentralizes any Pareto efficient allocation through prices and transfers under convexity and regularity. In post AGI economies, autonomy rights, self-modification, identity continuity, and superposed preferences need not behave as commodities or define a stable welfare relation, so this reduction may fail even when a supporting hyperplane exists. We give an autonomy-qualified Second Welfare Theorem stating the joint conditions convexity, stable moral status, non-fungible rights, welfare selection, non manipulation, governed self modification, and verification under which an autonomy Pareto optimum remains certifiably decentralizable, distinguishing economic preference superposition, a hypothesis about context-indexed choice, from neural feature superposition.

Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2606.08267 [cs.GT]

(or arXiv:2606.08267v1 [cs.GT] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.08267 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 200 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe