Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This research investigates the critical trade-offs in updating Key-Value (KV) caches when factual information changes, revealing that simple masking often degrades historical accuracy by up to 41 percentage points compared to preserving object dependencies. The study demonstrates that maintaining unchanged revision passages and utilizing query-dependent access mechanisms are essential for preventing unit errors while allowing models to adapt to new facts without losing prior context. These findings provide a foundational framework for building more reliable, updatable memory systems in large language models.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, Analytics Vidhya, LessWrong, Latent Space
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Positions Are Not Facts: The Mismatch Between KV Caches and Memory

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.33759v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When a fact changes, how should a language model update the history stored in its key-value (KV) cache? Hiding the old record is cheap, but it may still contain needed details or answer questions about the past. We compare hiding whole records, hiding only replaced values, and deleting old text and recomputing the cache. In a controlled quantity task, masking makes all eight models prefer the new value more strongly, yet six lose complete answers through unit errors or failure to stop; keeping the unit preserves all current answers. Later states also retain useful information from earlier records: on multi-hop updates, rebuilding these states at unchanged positions lowers historical accuracy by 20-41 percentage points, whereas moving the existing states has little effect. Keeping object dependencies and unchanged revision passages prevents many losses. Recognition is a separate challenge. Learned readouts recover distinctions missed by fixed cache similarities on synthetic record pairs. On natural text, text-detector-selected masks show no clear advantage over random masks at the same rate in 14 same-model detector-generator comparisons. Query-dependent access can avoid some losses, with additional storage or access costs. These findings identify what must be preserved beyond the replaced value when using a KV cache as updatable memory.

Abstract:When a fact changes, how should a language model update the history stored in its key-value (KV) cache? Hiding the old record is cheap, but it may still contain needed details or answer questions about the past. We compare hiding whole records, hiding only replaced values, and deleting old text and recomputing the cache. In a controlled quantity task, masking makes all eight models prefer the new value more strongly, yet six lose complete answers through unit errors or failure to stop; keeping the unit preserves all current answers. Later states also retain useful information from earlier records: on multi-hop updates, rebuilding these states at unchanged positions lowers historical accuracy by 20-41 percentage points, whereas moving the existing states has little effect. Keeping object dependencies and unchanged revision passages prevents many losses. Recognition is a separate challenge. Learned readouts recover distinctions missed by fixed cache similarities on synthetic record pairs. On natural text, text-detector-selected masks show no clear advantage over random masks at the same rate in 14 same-model detector-generator comparisons. Query-dependent access can avoid some losses, with additional storage or access costs. These findings identify what must be preserved beyond the replaced value when using a KV cache as updatable memory.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.33759 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.33759v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33759 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 300 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe