Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research establishes a fundamental theoretical limit for Howard's policy iteration on deterministic Markov decision processes, proving it lacks strong polynomiality under specific input conditions. The study highlights an exponential separation between decentralized, selfish improvement algorithms and coordinated optimization methods like the simplex method with Dantzig's pivoting rule. These findings are critical for understanding the computational complexity bounds of reinforcement learning algorithms and their scalability in high-dimensional state spaces.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, LessWrong, Quantum Zeitgeist
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Policy Iteration Is Not Strongly Polynomial for Deterministic Markov Decision Processes: The Price of Algorithmic Anarchy

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.40147v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We establish an exponential iteration lower bound in the number of states for Howard's policy iteration on deterministic discounted Markov decision processes, with at most two actions per state. This rules out strong polynomiality of Howard's policy iteration when the discount factor is part of the input and yields an exponential separation from the simplex method with Dantzig's pivoting rule, which is proved to be strongly polynomial on this class. Even when each reward is restricted to logarithmic bit length, we obtain a stretched-exponential iteration lower bound. The gap between Howard's decentralized and simultaneous selfish improvements and Dantzig's coordinated selection of a single action with the largest gain across all states reveals a ``price'' of algorithmic anarchy.

Abstract:We establish an exponential iteration lower bound in the number of states for Howard's policy iteration on deterministic discounted Markov decision processes, with at most two actions per state. This rules out strong polynomiality of Howard's policy iteration when the discount factor is part of the input and yields an exponential separation from the simplex method with Dantzig's pivoting rule, which is proved to be strongly polynomial on this class. Even when each reward is restricted to logarithmic bit length, we obtain a stretched-exponential iteration lower bound. The gap between Howard's decentralized and simultaneous selfish improvements and Dantzig's coordinated selection of a single action with the largest gain across all states reveals a ``price'' of algorithmic anarchy.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2609.40147 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.40147v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.40147 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 220 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe