Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

PLC-DPO introduces a robust method for Direct Preference Optimization by actively correcting noisy or ambiguous preference labels rather than simply filtering them out. By routing training signals into clean, flipped, or tie categories based on calibrated margins, this approach significantly improves win rates across diverse benchmarks compared to standard DPO. The technique offers a practical solution for aligning models using real-world data where supervision reliability is often compromised.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, LessWrong, AI Alignment Forum, Quantum Zeitgeist
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

PLC-DPO: Posterior Label Correction in Noisy and Ambiguous Preference Optimization

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2608.30597v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplifies alignment through pairwise comparisons but assumes all observed preferences are reliable. Real data often violates this assumption, leading to reversed, weak, or ambiguous labels that cause harmful policy updates. To address this, we propose Posterior Label Correction DPO (PLC-DPO) to robustly optimize preferences by routing each pair's training signal as a clean, flip, or tie case. The key idea is to use the calibrated policy-reference margin as online evidence to take appropriate correction actions. This reframes noisy preference learning as actively correcting supervision direction and strength rather than merely filtering suspicious examples. Across 57 dataset-model-benchmark cells, PLC-DPO obtains the best mean win rate against DPO (60.5 vs. 55.5 for the next-best method). Injected-noise and tie stress tests, human disagreement analysis, and self-confirmation diagnostics further show that the routing remains stable and distinguishes flipped from weakly directional pairs.

Abstract:Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplifies alignment through pairwise comparisons but assumes all observed preferences are reliable. Real data often violates this assumption, leading to reversed, weak, or ambiguous labels that cause harmful policy updates. To address this, we propose Posterior Label Correction DPO (PLC-DPO) to robustly optimize preferences by routing each pair's training signal as a clean, flip, or tie case. The key idea is to use the calibrated policy-reference margin as online evidence to take appropriate correction actions. This reframes noisy preference learning as actively correcting supervision direction and strength rather than merely filtering suspicious examples. Across 57 dataset-model-benchmark cells, PLC-DPO obtains the best mean win rate against DPO (60.5 vs. 55.5 for the next-best method). Injected-noise and tie stress tests, human disagreement analysis, and self-confirmation diagnostics further show that the routing remains stable and distinguishes flipped from weakly directional pairs.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2608.30597 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.30597v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30597 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 240 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe