analiza aiqbench
PLC-DPO introduces a robust method for Direct Preference Optimization by actively correcting noisy or ambiguous preference labels rather than simply filtering them out. By routing training signals into clean, flipped, or tie categories based on calibrated margins, this approach significantly improves win rates across diverse benchmarks compared to standard DPO. The technique offers a practical solution for aligning models using real-world data where supervision reliability is often compromised.
PLC-DPO: Posterior Label Correction in Noisy and Ambiguous Preference Optimization
arXiv:2608.30597v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplifies alignment through pairwise comparisons but assumes all observed preferences are reliable. Real data often violates this assumption, leading to reversed, weak, or ambiguous labels that cause harmful policy updates. To address this, we propose Posterior Label Correction DPO (PLC-DPO) to robustly optimize preferences by routing each pair's training signal as a clean, flip, or tie case. The key idea is to use the calibrated policy-reference margin as online evidence to take appropriate correction actions. This reframes noisy preference learning as actively correcting supervision direction and strength rather than merely filtering suspicious examples. Across 57 dataset-model-benchmark cells, PLC-DPO obtains the best mean win rate against DPO (60.5 vs. 55.5 for the next-best method). Injected-noise and tie stress tests, human disagreement analysis, and self-confirmation diagnostics further show that the routing remains stable and distinguishes flipped from weakly directional pairs.
Abstract:Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplifies alignment through pairwise comparisons but assumes all observed preferences are reliable. Real data often violates this assumption, leading to reversed, weak, or ambiguous labels that cause harmful policy updates. To address this, we propose Posterior Label Correction DPO (PLC-DPO) to robustly optimize preferences by routing each pair's training signal as a clean, flip, or tie case. The key idea is to use the calibrated policy-reference margin as online evidence to take appropriate correction actions. This reframes noisy preference learning as actively correcting supervision direction and strength rather than merely filtering suspicious examples. Across 57 dataset-model-benchmark cells, PLC-DPO obtains the best mean win rate against DPO (60.5 vs. 55.5 for the next-best method). Injected-noise and tie stress tests, human disagreement analysis, and self-confirmation diagnostics further show that the routing remains stable and distinguishes flipped from weakly directional pairs.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.30597 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.30597v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30597 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 240 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026

Mastering Agentic Techniques: AI Agent Customization
NVIDIA · 20 mai 2026
Amazon is investing in the Lean Focused Research Organization
Amazon Science · 26 iul. 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026