analiza aiqbench
PHIRL introduces a novel framework for inverse reinforcement learning that effectively bridges the gap between sparse human feedback and dense policy demonstrations by incorporating task progress metrics. This approach significantly improves data efficiency and robustness against reward hacking in robotic tasks, marking a substantive advancement in aligning learned rewards with actual task completion.
PHIRL: Aligning Learned Rewards with Task Progress for Inverse Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2609.31855v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human demonstrations provide dense policy-level information but sometimes lack local precision. Human feedback presents accurate local critiques, but offers sparse evaluations rather than direct policy guidance. We propose Progress-Heuristicized Inverse Reinforcement Learning (PHIRL), a data-efficient framework that learns robust reward functions by jointly leveraging demonstrations and feedback. Specifically, we use progress, a feedback modality that describes cumulative task completion. PHIRL iteratively infers a reward function from demonstrations via inverse reinforcement learning, calculates the learned rewards over the progress-annotated demonstrations, and aligns the rewards with progress annotations over four dimensions. We evaluate PHIRL on real and simulated robot tasks, with additional exploration using a fine-tuned vision-language model to provide progress feedback. Results demonstrate that PHIRL significantly outperforms the baselines, achieving substantially higher environmental return rewards and task success with only twenty percent of demonstrations annotated. Analysis of reward-hacking scenarios demonstrates that PHIRL learned reward functions are reliable against exploitation.
Abstract:Human demonstrations provide dense policy-level information but sometimes lack local precision. Human feedback presents accurate local critiques, but offers sparse evaluations rather than direct policy guidance. We propose Progress-Heuristicized Inverse Reinforcement Learning (PHIRL), a data-efficient framework that learns robust reward functions by jointly leveraging demonstrations and feedback. Specifically, we use progress, a feedback modality that describes cumulative task completion. PHIRL iteratively infers a reward function from demonstrations via inverse reinforcement learning, calculates the learned rewards over the progress-annotated demonstrations, and aligns the rewards with progress annotations over four dimensions. We evaluate PHIRL on real and simulated robot tasks, with additional exploration using a fine-tuned vision-language model to provide progress feedback. Results demonstrate that PHIRL significantly outperforms the baselines, achieving substantially higher environmental return rewards and task success with only twenty percent of demonstrations annotated. Analysis of reward-hacking scenarios demonstrates that PHIRL learned reward functions are reliable against exploitation.
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.31855 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.31855v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31855 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 244 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
LessWrong · 18 oct. 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · 23 sept. 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026