Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper introduces PESTO, a novel algorithm for LiDAR point cloud registration that utilizes tetrahedra as environment-agnostic features to handle occlusions effectively. The authors provide rigorous mathematical proofs establishing worst-case bounds on alignment error, distinguishing this work from purely empirical benchmarks. Such formal guarantees are critical for advancing the reliability of autonomous systems and robotics that depend on precise 3D spatial understanding.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

PESTO: Formally Correct Registration of LiDAR Point Clouds with Limited Overlap

arXiv1 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.18082v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper we tackle the problem of aligning LiDAR point clouds also known as the point cloud registration problem. We propose a new algorithm, PESTO, that exploits tetrahedra as "universal features" for LiDAR data, i.e., features that are agnostic to the environment where the LiDAR sensors are deployed. We show empirically that PESTO is competitive with existing solutions for aligning LiDAR point clouds, especially in environments with occlusions. Moreover, we establish PESTO's formal correctness by proving worst-case bounds on the alignment error.

Abstract:In this paper we tackle the problem of aligning LiDAR point clouds also known as the point cloud registration problem. We propose a new algorithm, PESTO, that exploits tetrahedra as "universal features" for LiDAR data, i.e., features that are agnostic to the environment where the LiDAR sensors are deployed. We show empirically that PESTO is competitive with existing solutions for aligning LiDAR point clouds, especially in environments with occlusions. Moreover, we establish PESTO's formal correctness by proving worst-case bounds on the alignment error.

8 pages. Accepted at the 65th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2026. This version includes appendices with proofs omitted from the conference version

Systems and Control (eess.SY); Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.18082 [eess.SY]

(or arXiv:2609.18082v1 [eess.SY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18082 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 129 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe