Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchAI & societate

analiza aiqbench

This paper proposes a framework where AI synthesizes open, identity-linked commentary to replace traditional anonymous peer review, creating an immutable audit trail via blockchain. The core innovation lies in using machine learning to manage iterative scholarly evaluation and trace reputational dynamics across diverse fields. By reframing validation as a transparent, living process, the work directly addresses latency and gatekeeping issues through advanced computational methods.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship

arXiv1 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2506.22497v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper reconceptualises peer review as structured public commentary. Traditional academic validation is hindered by anonymity, latency, and gatekeeping. We propose a transparent, identity-linked, and reproducible system of scholarly evaluation anchored in open commentary. Leveraging blockchain for immutable audit trails and AI for iterative synthesis, we design a framework that incentivises intellectual contribution, captures epistemic evolution, and enables traceable reputational dynamics. This model empowers fields from computational science to the humanities, reframing academic knowledge as a living process rather than a static credential.

Abstract:This paper reconceptualises peer review as structured public commentary. Traditional academic validation is hindered by anonymity, latency, and gatekeeping. We propose a transparent, identity-linked, and reproducible system of scholarly evaluation anchored in open commentary. Leveraging blockchain for immutable audit trails and AI for iterative synthesis, we design a framework that incentivises intellectual contribution, captures epistemic evolution, and enables traceable reputational dynamics. This model empowers fields from computational science to the humanities, reframing academic knowledge as a living process rather than a static credential.

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)

I.2.0; H.3.5; K.4.4

arXiv:2506.22497 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2506.22497v2 [cs.CY] for this version)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 115 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe