analiza aiqbench
This research challenges standard autoencoder architectures by demonstrating that a linear encoder can preserve most representational capacity if the decoder remains nonlinear. The study offers significant advantages in model parsimony and interpretability, particularly for latent representation analysis across synthetic and real-world datasets like MNIST. These findings provide a clearer geometric understanding of when linearity is sufficient for manifold learning tasks.
Partially Linear Autoencoders for Manifold Learning and Dimensionality Reduction
arXiv:2608.29867v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autoencoders are widely used for nonlinear dimensionality reduction and manifold learning. While most common implementations rely on both nonlinear encoders and decoders, we investigate the specific role of the encoder and the extent to which it can be constrained to be linear without reducing accuracy. We conduct a comparative study on four autoencoder architectures: standard fully nonlinear autoencoders (AE), linear-encoder autoencoders (Lenc-AE), linear-decoder autoencoders (Ldec-AE), and fully linear autoencoders (LAE), evaluated on synthetic manifolds, computational mechanics data sets, and real-world image data sets including MNIST. We demonstrate that imposing a linear encoder preserves most of the representational capacity of the autoencoder, provided the decoder remains nonlinear. In particular, Lenc-AE consistently outperforms both Ldec-AE and LAE, and achieves reconstruction quality comparable to fully nonlinear AE, while offering advantages in terms of parsimony and interpretability of the latent representation. These results suggest that the nonlinear decoder is the critical component for manifold learning, rather than the encoder. A geometric interpretation of this finding is developed, which identifies the precise conditions under which a linear encoder is sufficient, and the specific manifold configurations that expose its limitations.
Abstract:Autoencoders are widely used for nonlinear dimensionality reduction and manifold learning. While most common implementations rely on both nonlinear encoders and decoders, we investigate the specific role of the encoder and the extent to which it can be constrained to be linear without reducing accuracy. We conduct a comparative study on four autoencoder architectures: standard fully nonlinear autoencoders (AE), linear-encoder autoencoders (Lenc-AE), linear-decoder autoencoders (Ldec-AE), and fully linear autoencoders (LAE), evaluated on synthetic manifolds, computational mechanics data sets, and real-world image data sets including MNIST. We demonstrate that imposing a linear encoder preserves most of the representational capacity of the autoencoder, provided the decoder remains nonlinear. In particular, Lenc-AE consistently outperforms both Ldec-AE and LAE, and achieves reconstruction quality comparable to fully nonlinear AE, while offering advantages in terms of parsimony and interpretability of the latent representation. These results suggest that the nonlinear decoder is the critical component for manifold learning, rather than the encoder. A geometric interpretation of this finding is developed, which identifies the precise conditions under which a linear encoder is sufficient, and the specific manifold configurations that expose its limitations.
19 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables. Preprint also available on HAL: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.29867 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.29867v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29867 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 292 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026
Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Bayesian Optimization
arXiv · 14 sept. 2026

Manifolds for Five-Year Olds
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026
Deep Invertible Autoencoders for Dimensionality Reduction of Dynamical Systems
arXiv · 16 sept. 2026