analiza aiqbench
The paper applies supervised fine-tuning with reweighted action chunks to a vision-language-action policy for robotic disassembly, reporting 87/100 successful approach-and-handoff trials versus 54/100 for vanilla post-SFT. The evaluation covers a single robot (UR5e) and motherboard disassembly across five component classes, so the gain's generality to other products and robots is untested. For ML readers, the useful idea is treating a policy's own rollouts and human corrections as weighted training data, not just as a source of new demonstrations.
PACER: Process-Aware VLA Policy Learning from Human Corrections for Robotic Disassembly
arXiv:2610.19248v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robotic disassembly of end-of-life (EoL) products requires robots to accommodate product variation, follow prerequisite sequences, and approach components precisely for contact-rich manipulation. Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) provides a practical path for adaptation, but limited and costly disassembly data cannot capture the distribution shifts arising from changing environments and product uncertainties. The policy's own rollouts record its approach attempts, and human corrections demonstrate recovery from its errors, but turning these experiences into better policy performance remains challenging. We introduce PACER, a Process-Aware Correction and Evidence Reweighting framework that learns from these experiences through SFT, using progress toward the target and each trace's source and outcome to weight valid action chunks in the native supervised action loss. PACER trains one policy per weighting setting and selects one of the resulting policies through held-out validation. We evaluate PACER on UR5e motherboard disassembly across five component classes, where it achieves 87/100 successful approach-and-handoff trials on the held-out benchmark, compared with 54/100 for vanilla post-SFT.
Abstract:Robotic disassembly of end-of-life (EoL) products requires robots to accommodate product variation, follow prerequisite sequences, and approach components precisely for contact-rich manipulation. Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) provides a practical path for adaptation, but limited and costly disassembly data cannot capture the distribution shifts arising from changing environments and product uncertainties. The policy's own rollouts record its approach attempts, and human corrections demonstrate recovery from its errors, but turning these experiences into better policy performance remains challenging. We introduce PACER, a Process-Aware Correction and Evidence Reweighting framework that learns from these experiences through SFT, using progress toward the target and each trace's source and outcome to weight valid action chunks in the native supervised action loss. PACER trains one policy per weighting setting and selects one of the resulting policies through held-out validation. We evaluate PACER on UR5e motherboard disassembly across five component classes, where it achieves 87/100 successful approach-and-handoff trials on the held-out benchmark, compared with 54/100 for vanilla post-SFT.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2610.19248 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.19248v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19248 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 252 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026

Underwriting Superintelligence: Backing Agents you can Sue — Rune Kvist, AIUC
Latent Space · 16 sept. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

An unexamined cause of the OpenAI Hugging Face hacking incident: its binary performance metric
LessWrong · 23 sept. 2026