analiza aiqbench
OpenMAS-GCom introduces a diagnostic benchmark that isolates the impact of communication graphs and role assignments within multi-agent systems, addressing the difficulty of attributing performance differences in complex LLM ensembles. By systematically modifying components like agent roles and message flows while holding other variables constant, this tool provides researchers with clear insights into how specific architectural choices influence accuracy and efficiency. This work advances the field by offering a rigorous framework for evaluating graph-enhanced architectures beyond simple aggregate scores.
OpenMAS-GCom. A Diagnostic Benchmark for Graph-enhanced Multi-Agent Systems
arXiv:2609.21527v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph-enhanced multi-agent systems (G-MAS) coordinate large language model agents through communication graphs and role assignments, which determine how agents exchange information and divide responsibilities. However, final-score comparisons across systems combine differences in models, communication patterns, roles, and computation costs, making performance differences difficult to attribute to specific communication structures, role assignments, and information flows. To address this evaluation attribution problem, we introduce OpenMAS-GCom, a benchmark for diagnosing how these components affect G-MAS performance through controlled interventions. We represent systems through collaboration units, communication links, shared intermediate information, and execution rules. OpenMAS-GCom compares original systems with versions modified by changing one component while keeping tasks, models, prompts, and budget limits fixed. We rewire communication edges, remove specialist or critic agents, replace intermediate messages with incorrect content, and disable workers during execution. The benchmark evaluates 17 single-agent, ordinary multi-agent, and graph-enhanced configurations on 29 datasets across six domains. We add 400 G-MAS-Complex tasks requiring agents to combine information from multiple documents, resolve conflicting records, and return specified values with source identifiers. Experiments show larger mean losses after specialist removal than after critic removal, different performance degradation under incorrect messages and worker failures despite similar original scores, and different configurations achieving the highest accuracy and accuracy per token on G-MAS-Complex.
Title:OpenMAS-GCom. A Diagnostic Benchmark for Graph-enhanced Multi-Agent Systems
Abstract:Graph-enhanced multi-agent systems (G-MAS) coordinate large language model agents through communication graphs and role assignments, which determine how agents exchange information and divide responsibilities. However, final-score comparisons across systems combine differences in models, communication patterns, roles, and computation costs, making performance differences difficult to attribute to specific communication structures, role assignments, and information flows. To address this evaluation attribution problem, we introduce OpenMAS-GCom, a benchmark for diagnosing how these components affect G-MAS performance through controlled interventions. We represent systems through collaboration units, communication links, shared intermediate information, and execution rules. OpenMAS-GCom compares original systems with versions modified by changing one component while keeping tasks, models, prompts, and budget limits fixed. We rewire communication edges, remove specialist or critic agents, replace intermediate messages with incorrect content, and disable workers during execution. The benchmark evaluates 17 single-agent, ordinary multi-agent, and graph-enhanced configurations on 29 datasets across six domains. We add 400 G-MAS-Complex tasks requiring agents to combine information from multiple documents, resolve conflicting records, and return specified values with source identifiers. Experiments show larger mean losses after specialist removal than after critic removal, different performance degradation under incorrect messages and worker failures despite similar original scores, and different configurations achieving the highest accuracy and accuracy per token on G-MAS-Complex.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.21527 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.21527v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21527 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 309 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Beyond LLMs: Why Scalable Enterprise AI Adoption Depends on Agent Logic
Hugging Face · 1 iun. 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · 27 aug. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 7 iun. 2026