analiza aiqbench
This research introduces OP-Bench, a new evaluation framework addressing the critical issue of "over-personalization" in memory-augmented conversational agents. By identifying specific failure modes like irrelevance and sycophancy, the study demonstrates that current models often misuse user memories even when unnecessary, prompting the proposal of Self-ReCheck as a lightweight filtering solution. This work is essential for advancing safe and socially appropriate AI interactions by shifting benchmarking focus from mere recall accuracy to the appropriateness of personalization.
OP-Bench: Benchmarking Over-Personalization for Memory-Augmented Personalized Conversational Agents
arXiv:2601.13722v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Memory-augmented conversational agents enable personalized interactions using long-term user memory and have gained substantial traction. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on whether agents can recall and apply user information, while overlooking whether such personalization is used appropriately. In fact, agents may overuse personal information, producing responses that feel forced, intrusive, or socially inappropriate to users. We refer to this issue as \emph{over-personalization}. In this work, we formalize over-personalization into three types: Irrelevance, Repetition, and Sycophancy, and introduce \textbf{OP-Bench} a benchmark of 1,700 verified instances constructed from long-horizon dialogue histories. Using \textbf{OP-Bench}, we evaluate multiple large language models and memory-augmentation methods, and find that over-personalization is widespread when memory is introduced. Further analysis reveals that agents tend to retrieve and over-attend to user memories even when unnecessary. To address this issue, we propose \textbf{Self-ReCheck}, a lightweight, model-agnostic memory filtering mechanism that mitigates over-personalization while preserving personalization performance. Our work takes an initial step toward more controllable and appropriate personalization in memory-augmented dialogue systems.
Abstract:Memory-augmented conversational agents enable personalized interactions using long-term user memory and have gained substantial traction. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on whether agents can recall and apply user information, while overlooking whether such personalization is used appropriately. In fact, agents may overuse personal information, producing responses that feel forced, intrusive, or socially inappropriate to users. We refer to this issue as \emph{over-personalization}. In this work, we formalize over-personalization into three types: Irrelevance, Repetition, and Sycophancy, and introduce \textbf{OP-Bench} a benchmark of 1,700 verified instances constructed from long-horizon dialogue histories. Using \textbf{OP-Bench}, we evaluate multiple large language models and memory-augmentation methods, and find that over-personalization is widespread when memory is introduced. Further analysis reveals that agents tend to retrieve and over-attend to user memories even when unnecessary. To address this issue, we propose \textbf{Self-ReCheck}, a lightweight, model-agnostic memory filtering mechanism that mitigates over-personalization while preserving personalization performance. Our work takes an initial step toward more controllable and appropriate personalization in memory-augmented dialogue systems.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2601.13722 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2601.13722v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.13722 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 258 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
[AINews] Meta Connect 2026: Muse glasses, voice, video, and Charm
Latent Space · 24 sept. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026

Benchtalks #3: We taught AI everything except how to learn
Snorkel AI Blog · 25 iun. 2026

[AINews] Gemini 4 Argon: GDM’s answer to Astra/Fable, with 1M output
Latent Space · 1 oct. 2026