analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the efficiency of routing prompts to specialized large language model experts under strict feedback constraints, framing the problem as a bandit optimization task. By minimizing regret in both full-information and limited-feedback regimes, the study offers practical algorithms for scaling expert systems without requiring exhaustive data collection. The work advances the theoretical foundations of adaptive orchestration, which is critical for deploying cost-effective and high-performance AI agents in real-world scenarios.
Online Learning with LLM Experts from Limited Feedback
arXiv:2609.05820v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study adaptive routing of prompts to large language model (LLM) experts to maximize response quality in an online setting with limited feedback. We formulate it as a bandit problem with $K$ actions that represent experts and $d$ features that encode prompts, over a horizon of $T$ rounds. We propose algorithms that strategically select and observe rewards to minimize regret. In the full-information setting, we achieve a regret of $\tilde{O}(d T / \sqrt{m})$, while in the bandit setting we achieve $\tilde{O}(d T \sqrt{K / m})$, where $m \ll T$ is a budget on feedback. Our experiments show that we efficiently learn high-quality routing strategies across diverse LLMs from limited feedback.
Abstract:We study adaptive routing of prompts to large language model (LLM) experts to maximize response quality in an online setting with limited feedback. We formulate it as a bandit problem with $K$ actions that represent experts and $d$ features that encode prompts, over a horizon of $T$ rounds. We propose algorithms that strategically select and observe rewards to minimize regret. In the full-information setting, we achieve a regret of $\tilde{O}(d T / \sqrt{m})$, while in the bandit setting we achieve $\tilde{O}(d T \sqrt{K / m})$, where $m \ll T$ is a budget on feedback. Our experiments show that we efficiently learn high-quality routing strategies across diverse LLMs from limited feedback.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.05820 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.05820v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05820 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 207 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

Artmarket.com: H1 2026 Financial Report -- One-of-a - Kind AI Systems Intuitive Artmarket and Blind Spot Will Drive the Next Phase of Growth for
australiannews.net · 29 sept. 2026
Artmarket.com: H1 2026 Financial Report -- One-of-a - Kind AI Systems Intuitive Artmarket® and Blind Spot Will Drive the Next Phase of Growth for AI - First Artprice in 2026 - 2030
thailand-business-news.com · 28 sept. 2026