Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research introduces "counterfactual tracking," a novel framework for online control of linear dynamical systems that effectively decouples learning from control tasks. By treating policy changes as switching costs, the method achieves minimax-optimal regret bounds even against nonlinear or history-dependent benchmark policies without assuming common decay rates. This advancement significantly broadens the theoretical guarantees for adaptive control systems in adversarial environments.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Online Control via Counterfactual Tracking

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2607.13029v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study online control of a known linear dynamical system with adversarial costs and bounded disturbances, measuring regret against a general class of benchmark policies. We introduce counterfactual tracking, which separates the challenge of learning from the challenge of controlling the system. An online learner builds a reference trajectory by selecting or averaging the trajectories that the benchmark policies would have generated under the realized costs and disturbances, and a corrective law steers the system toward that reference. Charging each change in the reference its recovery cost (the cost of steering the system onto the new reference) reduces the problem to online learning with switching costs. Conversely, under additional natural assumptions, we show that this reduction is tight: the two problems have the same minimax regret up to a system-dependent factor, uniformly over horizons and policy classes. The reduction gives sharp regret guarantees for policy classes beyond standard finite-memory parameterizations. For a class of $N$ possibly nonlinear or history-dependent policies, it achieves $O(\sqrt{T\log N})$ regret over $T$ rounds, provided their trajectories remain within a bounded distance of one another and recovery costs are bounded. For the full $\ell_1$ ball of disturbance-response controllers, it achieves $O(\sqrt{T\log T})$ regret, which is minimax optimal in $T$, without assuming a common decay rate for disturbance effects. The framework also improves the best known regret bounds for linear state-feedback policies.

Abstract:We study online control of a known linear dynamical system with adversarial costs and bounded disturbances, measuring regret against a general class of benchmark policies. We introduce counterfactual tracking, which separates the challenge of learning from the challenge of controlling the system. An online learner builds a reference trajectory by selecting or averaging the trajectories that the benchmark policies would have generated under the realized costs and disturbances, and a corrective law steers the system toward that reference. Charging each change in the reference its recovery cost (the cost of steering the system onto the new reference) reduces the problem to online learning with switching costs. Conversely, under additional natural assumptions, we show that this reduction is tight: the two problems have the same minimax regret up to a system-dependent factor, uniformly over horizons and policy classes. The reduction gives sharp regret guarantees for policy classes beyond standard finite-memory parameterizations. For a class of $N$ possibly nonlinear or history-dependent policies, it achieves $O(\sqrt{T\log N})$ regret over $T$ rounds, provided their trajectories remain within a bounded distance of one another and recovery costs are bounded. For the full $\ell_1$ ball of disturbance-response controllers, it achieves $O(\sqrt{T\log T})$ regret, which is minimax optimal in $T$, without assuming a common decay rate for disturbance effects. The framework also improves the best known regret bounds for linear state-feedback policies.

Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2607.13029 [math.OC]

(or arXiv:2607.13029v2 [math.OC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.13029 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 328 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe