Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchSiguranță AI

analiza aiqbench

This research addresses the reliability of generative AI systems by introducing ExAUL, a framework that enables confident abstention under partial feedback and adversarial conditions. By converting bandit regret bounds into selective risk guarantees, the method ensures LLMs maintain safety controls comparable to full-information settings while operating in non-stationary environments. The work is significant for deploying trustworthy interactive agents where user feedback is limited or potentially manipulated.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Online Conformal Abstention Under Adversarial Bandit Feedback

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2506.14067v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As interactive generative systems are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, their tendency to generate unreliable or false responses raises serious concerns. Conformal abstention mitigates this risk by ensuring that the system answers only when confident. However, real-world deployments typically provide only partial user feedback (e.g., thumbs up/down) on the selected response and often operate in non-stationary or adversarial environments, for which effective learning methods are largely missing. To bridge this gap, we propose ExAUL, a novel online learning framework for conformal abstention with adversarial and partial feedback. Technically, we introduce (i) a novel conversion lemma that translates the regret of any bandit algorithm into a selective risk (SR) bound, and (ii) feedback unlocking, a strategy that exploits the structure of conformal abstention to extract additional learning signals from partial feedback. We prove that ExAUL achieves a regret bound of $O(\sqrt{T \ln |\Hs|})$, which translates into an $O(\sqrt{T})$ bound on SR violation control, matching the controllability of full-information settings despite receiving only partial feedback. While applicable to general generative tasks, we demonstrate the efficacy of ExAUL for ensuring the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) through empirical validation on question-answering tasks across diverse non-stationary and adversarial settings. Our results demonstrate that ExAUL robustly controls the SR while maintaining competitive answering coverage.

Abstract:As interactive generative systems are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, their tendency to generate unreliable or false responses raises serious concerns. Conformal abstention mitigates this risk by ensuring that the system answers only when confident. However, real-world deployments typically provide only partial user feedback (e.g., thumbs up/down) on the selected response and often operate in non-stationary or adversarial environments, for which effective learning methods are largely missing. To bridge this gap, we propose ExAUL, a novel online learning framework for conformal abstention with adversarial and partial feedback. Technically, we introduce (i) a novel conversion lemma that translates the regret of any bandit algorithm into a selective risk (SR) bound, and (ii) feedback unlocking, a strategy that exploits the structure of conformal abstention to extract additional learning signals from partial feedback. We prove that ExAUL achieves a regret bound of $O(\sqrt{T \ln |\Hs|})$, which translates into an $O(\sqrt{T})$ bound on SR violation control, matching the controllability of full-information settings despite receiving only partial feedback. While applicable to general generative tasks, we demonstrate the efficacy of ExAUL for ensuring the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) through empirical validation on question-answering tasks across diverse non-stationary and adversarial settings. Our results demonstrate that ExAUL robustly controls the SR while maintaining competitive answering coverage.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2506.14067 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2506.14067v5 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.14067 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 302 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe