analiza aiqbench
This research demonstrates that Natural Language Generation (NLG) for driver safety cannot rely on a generic high-income model, as local context, regulation, and data availability fundamentally alter system design. By comparing deployments in the UK and Nigeria, the study establishes a requirements-to-content framework where factors like speed-limit metadata and local traffic priorities dictate specific feedback mechanisms. The findings provide critical insights for building credible, safety-critical AI applications that adapt to diverse global infrastructures rather than assuming a one-size-fits-all approach.
One Feedback System Does Not Fit All: Localising Data-to-Text Driver Coaching for the United Kingdom and Nigeria
arXiv:2609.14687v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data-to-text driver coaching is often presented as a generic pipeline from telematics events to advice. This paper argues that its content requires localisation because usefulness and credibility depend on drivers' knowledge, prevalent risks, regulation, infrastructure, and available data. Two independently developed systems in the United Kingdom and Nigeria are compared by tracing requirements through content selection, generation, and field evaluation. The UK system prioritises post-trip reflection, explanations tied to road and place context, and tone-sensitive wording. The Nigerian system combines legally grounded, once-daily Tips based on detected events with weekly persuasive Reports; it foregrounds safety education and alcohol-related risk in response to reported gaps in formal training and traffic-rule knowledge, as well as local road-safety priorities. Reliable speed-limit metadata supported speeding feedback in the UK, whereas its scarcity led the Nigerian evaluation to exclude speeding from its outcome metric. Both interventions were associated with reduced distance-normalised unsafe-event rates in their own field studies, although their designs and metrics preclude an effect-size comparison. The analysis yields a requirements-to-content design process for localising safety-critical NLG without treating a high-income deployment as the default.
Abstract:Data-to-text driver coaching is often presented as a generic pipeline from telematics events to advice. This paper argues that its content requires localisation because usefulness and credibility depend on drivers' knowledge, prevalent risks, regulation, infrastructure, and available data. Two independently developed systems in the United Kingdom and Nigeria are compared by tracing requirements through content selection, generation, and field evaluation. The UK system prioritises post-trip reflection, explanations tied to road and place context, and tone-sensitive wording. The Nigerian system combines legally grounded, once-daily Tips based on detected events with weekly persuasive Reports; it foregrounds safety education and alcohol-related risk in response to reported gaps in formal training and traffic-rule knowledge, as well as local road-safety priorities. Reliable speed-limit metadata supported speeding feedback in the UK, whereas its scarcity led the Nigerian evaluation to exclude speeding from its outcome metric. Both interventions were associated with reduced distance-normalised unsafe-event rates in their own field studies, although their designs and metrics preclude an effect-size comparison. The analysis yields a requirements-to-content design process for localising safety-critical NLG without treating a high-income deployment as the default.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
arXiv:2609.14687 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.14687v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14687 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 279 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · 8 iun. 2026

Forbes Asia 100 To Watch 2026
forbes.com · 24 aug. 2026

A New Era of Discovery: Google Research at I/O 2026
Google Research · 28 mai 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026