Sari la conținut

localeBeta.label localeBeta.notice localeBeta.readInEnglish

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper introduces SELECTBENCH, a new benchmark evaluating the selectivity of generative models in structure-based drug design to address high clinical attrition rates caused by off-target interactions. The study reveals that current methods, including those explicitly trained for selectivity and inference-time guidance, achieve only modest discrimination against unintended protein bindings. This work provides an open platform to systematically assess and accelerate improvements in AI-driven molecular generation for pharmaceutical applications.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

On the Selectivity of Generative Models in Structure-Based Drug Design

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.24124v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Designing small-molecule drugs that selectively bind to a target protein while avoiding unintended interactions with other proteins is essential for reducing side effects that contribute substantially to clinical attrition. Although structure-based drug design (SBDD) has advanced rapidly with deep learning, most generative models still optimize binding to a single target and disregard selectivity due to limited training data and unknown off-target interactions. Motivated by this gap, we introduce SELECTBENCH, a comprehensive benchmark assessing the selectivity of generative SBDD models. SELECTBENCH provides three curated evaluation tasks reflecting different real-world drug discovery scenarios: literature-based case studies, safety screening panels used in pharmaceutical development, and large-scale structure-based evaluation sets. We further introduce a suite of metrics to quantify selectivity and conduct a systematic evaluation of nine representative SBDD models, including methods explicitly trained for selectivity and widely-used inference-time guidance techniques. Our results show that even selectivity-trained models achieve only modest off-target discrimination and inference-time guidance provides limited gains, underscoring the need for method improvement. SELECTBENCH provides both a characterization of where current generative SBDD stands on selectivity and an open, extensible platform to accelerate progress. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/lovetaro/selectbench.

Abstract:Designing small-molecule drugs that selectively bind to a target protein while avoiding unintended interactions with other proteins is essential for reducing side effects that contribute substantially to clinical attrition. Although structure-based drug design (SBDD) has advanced rapidly with deep learning, most generative models still optimize binding to a single target and disregard selectivity due to limited training data and unknown off-target interactions. Motivated by this gap, we introduce SELECTBENCH, a comprehensive benchmark assessing the selectivity of generative SBDD models. SELECTBENCH provides three curated evaluation tasks reflecting different real-world drug discovery scenarios: literature-based case studies, safety screening panels used in pharmaceutical development, and large-scale structure-based evaluation sets. We further introduce a suite of metrics to quantify selectivity and conduct a systematic evaluation of nine representative SBDD models, including methods explicitly trained for selectivity and widely-used inference-time guidance techniques. Our results show that even selectivity-trained models achieve only modest off-target discrimination and inference-time guidance provides limited gains, underscoring the need for method improvement. SELECTBENCH provides both a characterization of where current generative SBDD stands on selectivity and an open, extensible platform to accelerate progress. The benchmark is available at this https URL.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.24124 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.24124v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.24124 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 287 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe