analiza aiqbench
This study establishes that for univariate significant wave height forecasting, deep learning architecture selection yields diminishing returns as model performance converges across diverse structures like Mamba2 and LSTMs. The research highlights that cross-dataset variance dominates forecast error more than architectural differences, suggesting future progress requires integrating atmospheric covariates rather than engineering new models. These findings provide a critical baseline for developers aiming to move beyond single-station predictions toward robust, physics-informed multivariate systems.
On the Limits of Univariate Deep Learning for Significant Wave Height Forecasting
arXiv:2609.30688v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This study conducts a systematic hyperparameter search across five deep learning architectures, DLinear, LSTM, PatchTST, ResAttLstm, and Mamba2, and nine context lengths (1-168 h) for single-station significant wave height (Hs) forecasting on NDBC buoy 41009, followed by re-evaluation of the best configurations on a 47-buoy, 37-year corpus. The five families converge to a common performance level on the multi-buoy evaluation (between-family SD = 0.0014 m^2, 0.8% of the grand mean), a spread dwarfed by the 4.83x cross-dataset MSE shift between buoy corpora. All multi-buoy trials beat persistence (mean skill +0.062), but no architecture consistently outperforms the others. On the single-buoy experiment, skill peaks at 12-24 h where five trials fall below persistence, per-family Q4/Q3 test MSE ratios range from 2.4 to 2.6, and deep models underperform persistence for the most extreme 1% of waves. These findings are consistent with the interpretation that persistence already captures the dominant linear-inertial signal in univariate Hs, and that architecture engineering under this univariate input setting has reached diminishing returns: cross-buoy variance, not model class, dominates forecast error. Future work should prioritise atmospheric covariates, zero-shot cross-buoy transfer, and decomposition of Hs into swell and wind-sea components. By establishing a rigorous reference baseline for what univariate Hs models can and cannot achieve, this study provides a benchmark against which future multivariate and physics-informed approaches can be calibrated, and offers practical guidance for lightweight buoy-level forecasting in mid-latitude storm-dominated and swell-mixed environments.
Abstract:This study conducts a systematic hyperparameter search across five deep learning architectures, DLinear, LSTM, PatchTST, ResAttLstm, and Mamba2, and nine context lengths (1-168 h) for single-station significant wave height (Hs) forecasting on NDBC buoy 41009, followed by re-evaluation of the best configurations on a 47-buoy, 37-year corpus. The five families converge to a common performance level on the multi-buoy evaluation (between-family SD = 0.0014 m^2, 0.8% of the grand mean), a spread dwarfed by the 4.83x cross-dataset MSE shift between buoy corpora. All multi-buoy trials beat persistence (mean skill +0.062), but no architecture consistently outperforms the others. On the single-buoy experiment, skill peaks at 12-24 h where five trials fall below persistence, per-family Q4/Q3 test MSE ratios range from 2.4 to 2.6, and deep models underperform persistence for the most extreme 1% of waves. These findings are consistent with the interpretation that persistence already captures the dominant linear-inertial signal in univariate Hs, and that architecture engineering under this univariate input setting has reached diminishing returns: cross-buoy variance, not model class, dominates forecast error. Future work should prioritise atmospheric covariates, zero-shot cross-buoy transfer, and decomposition of Hs into swell and wind-sea components. By establishing a rigorous reference baseline for what univariate Hs models can and cannot achieve, this study provides a benchmark against which future multivariate and physics-informed approaches can be calibrated, and offers practical guidance for lightweight buoy-level forecasting in mid-latitude storm-dominated and swell-mixed environments.
33 pages, 13 figures. Author-accepted manuscript
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics (physics.ao-ph); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)
arXiv:2609.30688 [physics.ao-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.30688v1 [physics.ao-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30688 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.127187 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 353 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
CIWI-CKT: Chaos-Informed Wave Interference Feature Fusion and Cross-City Knowledge Transfer for Traffic Flow Forecasting
arXiv · 16 iun. 2026

2026.6: Pick a card, any card
Home Assistant · 3 iun. 2026
Operator Learning for Predicting Bulk Wave Parameters of Spectral Wave Models
arXiv · 1 sept. 2026
The hard physics and complex economics of AI’s insatiable hunger for power
SiliconANGLE · 11 sept. 2026