Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This study exposes critical failure modes in Maximal Coding Rate Reduction ($\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$), demonstrating that achieving global coding optimality does not guarantee robustness against distribution shifts or correlation reversals. The authors prove that even when test inputs are drawn from the training distribution, prediction error can approach 100% if representations rely on unstable environmental features rather than stable causal ones. Consequently, reliable out-of-distribution generalization for $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ requires new assumptions beyond standard invariance principles to ensure stable predictive relationships across environments.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

On the Limits of Maximal Coding Rate Reduction for Out-of-Distribution Generalisation

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.21001v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Substantial efforts have been devoted to making deep learning objectives, representations, and architectures interpretable, with the goal of improving the safety, robustness, and generalisation of learning systems in diverse real-world applications. The recently proposed maximal coding rate reduction ($\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$) offers a promising information-theoretic framework for learning structured, discriminative representations of class-wise submanifolds and has inspired interpretable white-box architectures. However, we observe that $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ can completely fail under distribution shift, motivating our study of its out-of-distribution (OOD) generalisation limits. We establish two limitations of $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ for OOD generalisation. First, the $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ objective alone can admit complete prediction failure: a representation based entirely on unstable environmental features can achieve the global coding optimum yet fail completely after correlation reversal, despite an available perfectly stable feature. This exact-optimum example includes test inputs that cannot occur during training. Even when every possible test input can also occur during training, coding quality can be arbitrarily close to optimal while prediction error is arbitrarily close to 100%. Second, directly incorporating the invariance principle underlying widely successful invariant risk minimisation (IRM) and risk extrapolation (REx) does not eliminate this failure. The failing representation admits the same optimal coding operator across training environments, showing that shared coding optimality does not ensure stable prediction. Reliable OOD guarantees for $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ therefore require additional new assumptions or learning principles that establish stable predictive relationships across environments.

Abstract:Substantial efforts have been devoted to making deep learning objectives, representations, and architectures interpretable, with the goal of improving the safety, robustness, and generalisation of learning systems in diverse real-world applications. The recently proposed maximal coding rate reduction ($\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$) offers a promising information-theoretic framework for learning structured, discriminative representations of class-wise submanifolds and has inspired interpretable white-box architectures. However, we observe that $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ can completely fail under distribution shift, motivating our study of its out-of-distribution (OOD) generalisation limits. We establish two limitations of $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ for OOD generalisation. First, the $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ objective alone can admit complete prediction failure: a representation based entirely on unstable environmental features can achieve the global coding optimum yet fail completely after correlation reversal, despite an available perfectly stable feature. This exact-optimum example includes test inputs that cannot occur during training. Even when every possible test input can also occur during training, coding quality can be arbitrarily close to optimal while prediction error is arbitrarily close to 100%. Second, directly incorporating the invariance principle underlying widely successful invariant risk minimisation (IRM) and risk extrapolation (REx) does not eliminate this failure. The failing representation admits the same optimal coding operator across training environments, showing that shared coding optimality does not ensure stable prediction. Reliable OOD guarantees for $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ therefore require additional new assumptions or learning principles that establish stable predictive relationships across environments.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.21001 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.21001v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21001 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 319 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe