analiza aiqbench
This research establishes mutual reductions between quantum secure multi-party computation tasks, specifically sealed-bid auctions and summation protocols, demonstrating how one can be instantiated using the other with optimal round complexity. The study validates these theoretical connections on a superconducting processor, offering concrete implementations for privacy-preserving computations where existing schemes often leak occupancy counts or require specific architectural changes.
On the generic structures of the protocols for quantum auction and quantum summation and their relation
arXiv:2606.27693v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Secure multi-party computation (SMC) addresses the problem of jointly computing global functions of private inputs while revealing minimal information about individual data. Two prominent examples of SMC tasks are sealed-bid auction and secure multi-party summation. Existing schemes for quantum auction and quantum summation have largely been developed independently, motivated by distinct applications and employing different computational primitives. In this work, mutual reductions between the two tasks are established for single-item sealed-bid auctions with first-price payment. In one direction, an auction used as a black box computes a secure sum: each party bids a private random key drawn from its input, so the clearing price depends on the inputs only through their sum $S$. The reduction is perfectly private against colluding semi-honest parties and uses $O(S^2\log(1/\delta))$ auction rounds, which is optimal, or $O(S\log(1/\delta))$ under coherent access. It can be instantiated with an existing auctioneer-free quantum auction after a one-line change to its disjunction subroutine, which as published leaks occupancy counts. In the other direction, summation with randomized inputs yields threshold disjunctions, and a single search over composite keys locates the highest bid and a winner, revealing nothing else. Because each query consumes the bidders' encodings, a bidder can adapt its effective bid undetected, while a fixed query set restores sealed bidding. Combinatorial auctions and general payment rules lie outside this framework. On a superconducting processor, one instance of each direction is executed, recovering the winner for four-bidder instances with ties and the sum of private inputs from repeated auctions.
Abstract:Secure multi-party computation (SMC) addresses the problem of jointly computing global functions of private inputs while revealing minimal information about individual data. Two prominent examples of SMC tasks are sealed-bid auction and secure multi-party summation. Existing schemes for quantum auction and quantum summation have largely been developed independently, motivated by distinct applications and employing different computational primitives. In this work, mutual reductions between the two tasks are established for single-item sealed-bid auctions with first-price payment. In one direction, an auction used as a black box computes a secure sum: each party bids a private random key drawn from its input, so the clearing price depends on the inputs only through their sum $S$. The reduction is perfectly private against colluding semi-honest parties and uses $O(S^2\log(1/\delta))$ auction rounds, which is optimal, or $O(S\log(1/\delta))$ under coherent access. It can be instantiated with an existing auctioneer-free quantum auction after a one-line change to its disjunction subroutine, which as published leaks occupancy counts. In the other direction, summation with randomized inputs yields threshold disjunctions, and a single search over composite keys locates the highest bid and a winner, revealing nothing else. Because each query consumes the bidders' encodings, a bidder can adapt its effective bid undetected, while a fixed query set restores sealed bidding. Combinatorial auctions and general payment rules lie outside this framework. On a superconducting processor, one instance of each direction is executed, recovering the winner for four-bidder instances with ties and the sum of private inputs from repeated auctions.
arXiv:2606.27693 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2606.27693v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.27693 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 337 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Artmarket.com: H1 2026 Financial Report -- One-of-a - Kind AI Systems Intuitive Artmarket and Blind Spot Will Drive the Next Phase of Growth for
australiannews.net · 29 sept. 2026
Artmarket.com: H1 2026 Financial Report -- One-of-a - Kind AI Systems Intuitive Artmarket® and Blind Spot Will Drive the Next Phase of Growth for AI - First Artprice in 2026 - 2030
thailand-business-news.com · 28 sept. 2026

Nicole’s guide to writing and editing
Quantum Frontiers · 26 aug. 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 aug. 2026