analiza aiqbench
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
On the Benefits of Uncertainty Estimation for Species Classification: A Case Study on Optimizing Expert re-Annotation
arXiv:2610.25977v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated identification of diatoms from microscopic images is a cornerstone of large-scale freshwater biomonitoring, yet the high diversity of species and strong class imbalance pose significant challenges for reliable classification. In this study, we develop a ResNet-18 baseline for a 759-class diatom dataset and investigate how calibrated confidence estimates support selective classification to reduce expert workload without sacrificing taxonomic integrity. While the initial model exhibits overconfidence with an Expected Calibration Error (ECE) of 0.117, post-hoc temperature scaling (T = 2.12) dramatically improves reliability, lowering the ECE to 0.055.By leveraging these calibrated probabilities within a triage framework, we demonstrate that a Selective Macro-F1 score of 99.01% can be maintained at 66.2% coverage (rejection threshold $\tau$ = 0.934). Qualitative analysis reveals that the system effectively functions as an intelligent filter, consistently deferring rare taxa-such as AAMB and AASI-and ambiguous morphologies for expert review. Our findings, supported by the torch-uncertainty framework, highlight the potential of simple calibration techniques to make automated diatom identification practical and robust, prioritizing the preservation of rare species metrics essential for ecological assessment. To support reproducibility, our code, environment specifications, and calibration results are available anonymously at https://anonymous.4open. science/r/greenprwksp-B53D/README.
Abstract:Automated identification of diatoms from microscopic images is a cornerstone of large-scale freshwater biomonitoring, yet the high diversity of species and strong class imbalance pose significant challenges for reliable classification. In this study, we develop a ResNet-18 baseline for a 759-class diatom dataset and investigate how calibrated confidence estimates support selective classification to reduce expert workload without sacrificing taxonomic integrity. While the initial model exhibits overconfidence with an Expected Calibration Error (ECE) of 0.117, post-hoc temperature scaling (T = 2.12) dramatically improves reliability, lowering the ECE to this http URL leveraging these calibrated probabilities within a triage framework, we demonstrate that a Selective Macro-F1 score of 99.01% can be maintained at 66.2% coverage (rejection threshold $\tau$ = 0.934). Qualitative analysis reveals that the system effectively functions as an intelligent filter, consistently deferring rare taxa-such as AAMB and AASI-and ambiguous morphologies for expert review. Our findings, supported by the torch-uncertainty framework, highlight the potential of simple calibration techniques to make automated diatom identification practical and robust, prioritizing the preservation of rare species metrics essential for ecological assessment. To support reproducibility, our code, environment specifications, and calibration results are available anonymously at https://anonymous.4open. science/r/greenprwksp-B53D/README.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2610.25977 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.25977v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.25977 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 290 cuvinte