Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research advances the theoretical understanding of Kernel Ridge Regression by linking generalization bounds directly to the stability of kernel matrix eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The study demonstrates that robust performance relies on increasing eigenvector alignment or eigenvalue gaps rather than minimizing reconstruction error, offering a more intuitive framework for analyzing finite-sample settings in kernel methods.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

On Kernel Eigen-alignments of KRR: Reconstruction and Generalization

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2605.15240v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper investigates the critical role of eigenalignments between the kernel matrix and learning targets in achieving robust generalization in learning problems. We establish a direct connection between generalization performance in kernel methods and the estimation of eigenvectors and eigenvalues of matrices, offering a more intuitive understanding compared to prior work with minimal assumptions. We also show that, since the prediction task in KRR is essentially the weighted sum of eigenvectors/singular vectors, by analyzing how much error can be caused by perturbations to the kernel matrix, we can then derive a bound on this generalization error using the estimation stability of matrix eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Compared with previous work, our analysis concentrates on finite-sample settings and on the generalization error arising from having a suboptimal finite training set. Our findings reveal that in kernel methods, as long as the kernel is of high rank, the near-zero reconstruction error can be trivially obtained, implying that the reconstruction error will have limited predictive power for generalization. Additionally, we establish a generalization bound from an eigenvalues/eigenvectors estimation perspective, showing that strong generalization requires increasing eigenvector alignment, eigenvalue magnitude, or gaps between consecutive eigenvalues. Finally, we also demonstrate empirically our simplified risk estimator is able to track testing errors in trailing eigendirections more closely than the existing literature.

Abstract:This paper investigates the critical role of eigenalignments between the kernel matrix and learning targets in achieving robust generalization in learning problems. We establish a direct connection between generalization performance in kernel methods and the estimation of eigenvectors and eigenvalues of matrices, offering a more intuitive understanding compared to prior work with minimal assumptions. We also show that, since the prediction task in KRR is essentially the weighted sum of eigenvectors/singular vectors, by analyzing how much error can be caused by perturbations to the kernel matrix, we can then derive a bound on this generalization error using the estimation stability of matrix eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Compared with previous work, our analysis concentrates on finite-sample settings and on the generalization error arising from having a suboptimal finite training set. Our findings reveal that in kernel methods, as long as the kernel is of high rank, the near-zero reconstruction error can be trivially obtained, implying that the reconstruction error will have limited predictive power for generalization. Additionally, we establish a generalization bound from an eigenvalues/eigenvectors estimation perspective, showing that strong generalization requires increasing eigenvector alignment, eigenvalue magnitude, or gaps between consecutive eigenvalues. Finally, we also demonstrate empirically our simplified risk estimator is able to track testing errors in trailing eigendirections more closely than the existing literature.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2605.15240 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2605.15240v2 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.15240 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 309 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe